Re: Popen and EVFILT_WRITE question

2008-04-01 Thread Mel
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 12:14:08 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > it will either read input or it won't, and what happens when it > > > reads depends entirely on what the fd it reads from is connected to, > > > w

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Rick C. Petty
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:24:44AM -0700, Patrick Dung wrote: > > I think Gvinum more like software raid then LVM (allocate/resize > Logical Volume on the fly). vinum *is* a (logical) volume manager. You don't have to use RAID at all, but it's easy enough to do. Resize is currently broken, but

Re: pfind() and the proc structure

2008-04-01 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:23:58 -0700, "Rao, Nikhil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I should have caught that :-( Another question - Now that the > PROC_LOCK on p is obtained the all_proc lock is released and the > function returns, at this point can't the proc get deallocated ? > > Nikhil > > 242 st

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Patrick Dung
--- Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick, good day. > > Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:18:56AM -0700, Patrick Dung wrote: > > 4. LVM and file systems > > > > As of FreeBSD 7.0, ZFS is ported. > > This is great as FreeBSD do not have LVM in the past. > > FreeBSD has gvinum since approx

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Patrick, good day. Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:18:56AM -0700, Patrick Dung wrote: > 4. LVM and file systems > > As of FreeBSD 7.0, ZFS is ported. > This is great as FreeBSD do not have LVM in the past. FreeBSD has gvinum since approximately 5.x and vinum since rather old days (3.0). Is something wr

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Ivan Voras
On 01/04/2008, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:00:05 +0200 Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Why OpenLDAP? Why not one of the other ldap implementations available > > > in the ports? In particular, do any of them already have plugins for > > > use

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Mike Meyer
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:00:05 +0200 Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why OpenLDAP? Why not one of the other ldap implementations available > > in the ports? In particular, do any of them already have plugins for > > use with pam? > > What are the other LDAP implementations in ports? Es

Re: pfind() and the proc structure

2008-04-01 Thread Roman Divacky
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:23:58AM -0700, Rao, Nikhil wrote: > > Ok, I should have caught that :-( Another question - > Now that the PROC_LOCK on p is obtained the all_proc lock is released > and the function returns, at this point can't the proc get deallocated ? well.. thats why you hold the p

RE: pfind() and the proc structure

2008-04-01 Thread Rao, Nikhil
Ok, I should have caught that :-( Another question - Now that the PROC_LOCK on p is obtained the all_proc lock is released and the function returns, at this point can't the proc get deallocated ? Nikhil 242 struct proc * 243 pfind(pid) 244 register pid_t pid; 245 { 246 register

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Patrick Dung
--- Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:18:56 -0700 (PDT) > Patrick Dung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 3. Support LDAP SSO out of the box > > > > Linux/Solaris/AIX have native LDAP SSO support. > > I have asked about this feature before. > > > > The problem is whet

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Ivan Voras
> Why OpenLDAP? Why not one of the other ldap implementations available > in the ports? In particular, do any of them already have plugins for > use with pam? What are the other LDAP implementations in ports? Especially the ones that are actively maintained (which excludes tinyldap)? Any complian

Re: Feature request

2008-04-01 Thread Patrick Dung
--- Mohacsi Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Patrick Dung wrote: > > > Hello > > > > I have some suggestions about improving FreeBSD in some of the > > areas/features. Let's discuss. > > > > 1. Cluster capability > > > > As I know, there is: > > - Linux HA heartbe

Re: Popen and EVFILT_WRITE question

2008-04-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > it will either read input or it won't, and what happens when it > > reads depends entirely on what the fd it reads from is connected to, > > whether it's a slow or fast device, blocking or non-blocking, etc. > The

Re: pfind() and the proc structure

2008-04-01 Thread Roman Divacky
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:03:31PM -0700, Rao, Nikhil wrote: > Hi List, > > The pfind(..) (in kern_proc.c) function below returns the proc structure > for the PID passed in > > Say the thread that calls pfind() gets blocked at PROC_LOCK(p) (line 255 > below), in the meantime what prevents the pro