Hi,all:
I am ready to intall sun xVM VirtualBox on my FreeBSD7.0,but have no
found in the ports,anybody can help me?
--
Boern Parx
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Boern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,all:
I am ready to intall sun xVM VirtualBox on my FreeBSD7.0,but have no
found in the ports,anybody can help me?
There is no port. VirtualBox depends on a kernel module that was not
ported to FreeBSD yet, among other things.
2008/10/31 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... If that's what you were referring to, then possibly making O_NOATIME
only to root would be a suitable compromise.
And no systems are compromised with rootkits?..
Igor :-)
___
Quoting Boern [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,all:
I am ready to intall sun xVM VirtualBox on my FreeBSD7.0,but have no
found in the ports,anybody can help me?
VirtualBox doesn't work on FreeBSD...
pgpOXLlePpZcx.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
on 30/10/2008 20:46 Peter Jeremy said the following:
On 2008-Oct-30 18:08:35 +0200, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. obtain and extract
http://www.memtest.org/download/2.01/memtest86+-2.01.bin.gz
This is a compressed bootable image and can't be compiled. Possibly
you mean
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 08:04:48AM +, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
2008/10/31 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... If that's what you were referring to, then possibly making O_NOATIME
only to root would be a suitable compromise.
And no systems are compromised with rootkits?..
utimes(2)
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 02:48:42PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
utimes(2) allows non-root users to (re)set atime provided they own the
file or have write permission. Having O_NOATIME follow the same rules
would not break any assumed security any further than utimes(2) already
does but
Hello,
with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours
depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) :
- on a video console, I see the expected two messages,
- on a serial console, the messages are not displayed (init silently finishes
its job and gets to start /etc/rc
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 30/10/2008 20:46 Peter Jeremy said the following:
On 2008-Oct-30 18:08:35 +0200, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ld --warn-constructors --warn-common -static -T memtest_shared.lds \
-o memtest_shared head.o reloc.o main.o test.o init.o
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:46:23PM +0100, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours
depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) :
- on a video console, I see the expected two messages,
- on a serial console, the messages are not
Le Friday 31 October 2008, Jeremy Chadwick a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 05:46:23PM +0100, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours
depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) :
- on a video console, I see the expected two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
[...]
utimes(2) allows non-root users to (re)set atime provided they own the
file or have write permission. Having O_NOATIME follow the same rules
would not break any assumed security any further than utimes(2) already
I believe someone has told me on this list that the proper way to
compile a linux program is to run configure
--includedir=/usr/local/include --libdir=/usr/local/lib. Is that
correct? I've got a bunch of linux weenies trying to tell me their
code isn't broken because I'm supposed to have headers
Hello Theirry,
* Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours
depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) :
- on a video console, I see the expected two messages,
- on a serial console, the messages are not displayed
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Nate Eldredge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Steve Franks wrote:
I believe someone has told me on this list that the proper way to
compile a linux program is to run configure
--includedir=/usr/local/include --libdir=/usr/local/lib.
Nitpick:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Steve Franks wrote:
Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program
that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd
where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm
really asking. Specifically, it's looking for libusb
* Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The multiplexed console feature is one thing that linux got right. In a
corporate setting, you really need both a serial console and a video
console in order to effectively manage the machines, as you want to be
able to access them both remotely and
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello Theirry,
* Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different behaviours
depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) :
- on a video console, I see the expected two messages,
- on a serial console, the messages
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Steve Franks wrote:
Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program
that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd
where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm
really
On Friday 31 October 2008 20:30:46 Steve Franks wrote:
Let's backup. What's the 'right' way to get a bloody linux program
that expects all it's headers in /usr/include to compile on freebsd
where all the headers are in /usr/local/include? That's all I'm
really asking. Specifically, it's
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:28:02PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello Theirry,
* Thierry Herbelot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the following patch on /sbin/init, I have two different
behaviours depending on the console type (on a i386/32 PC) :
- on a video console, I see
21 matches
Mail list logo
