> I would like to obtain fore mentioned data from within my module. I need
> these performance metrics to see how certain code executes, and make
> decisions during the runtime. pmc(3) seems complete, but it also seems to be
> intended for use in the userland.
>
> How to use pmc from modules? Is th
Hi.
Am I right that td_estcpu is only updated under SCHED_4BSD ?
(well, user's ki_estcpu is not used in top anyway. ps shows all zeroes
under SCHED_ULE (as it should then though). I'm just interested.)
--
wbr,
pluknet
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:18:20PM +0100, Nikola Kne??evi?? wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to obtain fore mentioned data from within my module. I
> need these performance metrics to see how certain code executes, and
> make decisions during the runtime. pmc(3) seems complete, but it also
> se
I'm messing around with dev/firewire/sbp_targ at home this week and
wanted to know if there was a way to warn or notify when trying to run
config against a kernel configuration file that has "device sbp_targ"
but doesn't have "device targbh". Is there such a mechanism?
Sean
_
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:39:03 Bruce Cran wrote:
> It seems ALTQ can't delay packets though, so you'd need to use dummynet
> for that.
You can work around it using hfsc's realtime:
hfsc(realtime (0Kb 300 128Kb))
1. 0Kbit of bandwidth guaranteed for the first 300ms
2. After 300ms 12
The First USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Parallelism will take place
March 30-31 in Berkeley, CA.
http://www.usenix.org/hotpar09/proga
HotPar '09 will bring together researchers and practitioners doing
innovative work in the area of parallel computing. HotPar recognizes the
broad impact of mult
Hi,
I would like to obtain fore mentioned data from within my module. I
need these performance metrics to see how certain code executes, and
make decisions during the runtime. pmc(3) seems complete, but it also
seems to be intended for use in the userland.
How to use pmc from modules? Is
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:57:15 +
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-02-18 11:42:00, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
ipfw(8) prob + dummynet(8).
Hi. Thanks for the quick response.
Is there, by any chance, an equivalent for PF? I see there's 'ALTQ'
but it looks to be poorly s
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:57:15 +
xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 2009-02-18 11:42:00, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >
> > ipfw(8) prob + dummynet(8).
> >
>
> Hi. Thanks for the quick response.
>
> Is there, by any chance, an equivalent for PF? I see there's 'ALTQ'
> but it looks to be poorl
Here is a link to a mailing list post about a patch to give dummynet
support in pf. It is _fairly_ recent and so may still be a little
buggy, but the poster seems quite confident that it works as
intended.
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd...@freebsd.org/msg03857.html
Cheers, Tim.
> On 2009-0
Hi,
I finally resolved this... (posted to the list for completeness / incase
someone else hits this issue).
Brief Solution: Reduce dram timing in the bios from DDR400 to DDR333.
Gory details: Having taken quite a trip through mptables, bioses, pulling /
pushing DIMM's etc. - all the DIMM's
On 2009-02-18 11:42:00, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> ipfw(8) prob + dummynet(8).
>
Hi. Thanks for the quick response.
Is there, by any chance, an equivalent for PF? I see there's 'ALTQ'
but it looks to be poorly supported (unless I misunderstand). I have
quite a complicated setup here with PF for
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, 08:34-, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I want to verify that a program I'm developing works correctly
> in poor network conditions (high latency, random packet loss, etc).
>
> I seem to remember reading something once about somebody simulating
> these condit
Hello.
I want to verify that a program I'm developing works correctly
in poor network conditions (high latency, random packet loss, etc).
I seem to remember reading something once about somebody simulating
these conditions with PF but can't remember where.
Anybody got any ideas about how I could
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:51:13PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 5:21:42 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:31:12AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 February 2009 5:16:07 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:55:44PM -
15 matches
Mail list logo
