On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
In response to Christian Peron c...@freebsd.org:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:58:09AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[..]
Why isn't the field an unsigned int / size_t? I don't see much value
in having the size
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
In response to Christian Peron c...@freebsd.org:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:58:09AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[..]
Why isn't the field an unsigned int / size_t? I
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:08:28PM -0600, Christian Peron wrote:
This issue has come up a number of times. I was looking into fixing this but
I
just have not had the time. The basic issue is our shmid_ds structure:
struct shmid_ds {
struct ipc_perm shm_perm; /* operation
Hi all,
I am a student from India. I am willing to contribute to FreeBSD
as a google soc participant this year. I would like to suggest an
idea.
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
Hence, I am not yet aware about the current
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Siddharth Prakash Singh
sps...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am a student from India. I am willing to contribute to FreeBSD
as a google soc participant this year. I would like to suggest an
idea.
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm ray.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore
Architectures.
Talk to j...@freebsd.org, the author
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:37:40AM +0530, Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm ray.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
Hence, I am not yet aware about the current
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore
Architectures.
Talk to j...@freebsd.org, the author of ULE.
Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA
Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm ray.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore
Architectures.
Sam Leffler wrote:
Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm ray.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore
Yeah I sent the same proposal to all the *BSD mailing list, because I
am interested in doing this project . What's wrong in proposing the
same project in all the *BSD organizations?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Jordan Gordeev jgord...@dir.bg wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
Siddharth Prakash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, I've lost track of the status of XFree86 on FreeBSD.or really,
at all. It looks like all of the Xfree86 servers have been removed from ports.
I was looking on the www.Xfree86.org website, and from what I see, it
apparently still is
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, I've lost track of the status of XFree86 on FreeBSD.or
really,
at all. It looks like all of the Xfree86 servers have been removed from
ports.
I was
Yeah I sent the same proposal to all the *BSD mailing list, because I
am interested in doing this project .
Have you read what others have said? do. your. homework. first.
What's wrong in proposing the same project in all the *BSD organizations?
You wouldn't have asked this question if you'd
Hi Chuck,
* Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
I was wondering, I've lost track of the status of XFree86 on
FreeBSD.or really, at all. It looks like all of the Xfree86 servers
have been removed from ports.
The XFree86 project has been dying ever since almost all the active
development
15 matches
Mail list logo
