Hi Current & Hackers,
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing this problem: Any use of
bsdtar to
create a new archive causes the process to be unresponsive to all signals and
consumes 100% cpu time. The machine I am testing on is a Core 2 quad running
in AMD64 (8 gigs ram, zfs boot,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
Why can't I do a lockf on a file descriptor that does not point a real file
(such as stderr, stdout, or a character device)?
Since it works under NetBSD, Linux, Solaris. For portability between systems
I hope I can do it under FreeBSD.
The follow
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:17:15PM -0600, Rick C. Petty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:36:09PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:47:38PM -0600, Rick C. Petty wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:30:14PM -0600, Octavian Covalschi wrote:
> > > > Why is spinning down is
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:17:15PM -0600, Rick C. Petty wrote:
> What I was hoping is that someone could point me to the "spinup" command as
> I have a drive which does not spin up until it receives this command. Any
> takers?
There is no such command. Disks are supposed to spin up at the first
r
Hi,
Why can't I do a lockf on a file descriptor that does not point a real
file (such as stderr, stdout, or a character device)?
Since it works under NetBSD, Linux, Solaris. For portability between
systems I hope I can do it under FreeBSD.
The following code is simple, but It reproduce the proble
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:36:09PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:47:38PM -0600, Rick C. Petty wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:30:14PM -0600, Octavian Covalschi wrote:
> > > Why is spinning down is bad for HDD ? I believe it's better to spindown a
> > > drive,
> > > i
On Monday 09 March 2009 3:38:55 pm Alexej Sokolov wrote:
> 2009/3/9 John Baldwin
>
> > On Friday 06 March 2009 11:13:38 am Alexej Sokolov wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I try to MALLOC a buffer in kern, then remap it with vm_map_find(), to
> > space
> > > of user process.
> > > Some times the remapped
2009/3/9 John Baldwin
> On Friday 06 March 2009 11:13:38 am Alexej Sokolov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I try to MALLOC a buffer in kern, then remap it with vm_map_find(), to
> space
> > of user process.
> > Some times the remapped buffer in user space contain incorrect data.
>
> What architecture are y
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:00:22PM +, freebsd-hackers-requ...@freebsd.org
wrote:
> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:08:56 -0800 (PST)
> From: Martin Badie
> Subject: select.h FD_SETSIZE and Qmail-Postfix test
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <67469.69113...@web59906.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
On Friday 06 March 2009 11:13:38 am Alexej Sokolov wrote:
> Hello,
> I try to MALLOC a buffer in kern, then remap it with vm_map_find(), to space
> of user process.
> Some times the remapped buffer in user space contain incorrect data.
What architecture are you using? On some archs like amd64, sm
Dan Nelson wrote:
> I was wondering why you were having so much trouble finding what you were
> looking for, and then I realized I have a patch that I have never submitted
> a PR for: the addition of "systime" and "usertime" ps keywords :) It simply
> reads the rusage struct, and returns the same v
11 matches
Mail list logo
