Hi.
My system FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE periodically freeze.
I`m compiling kernel with WITNESS and get backtrace.
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195
#1 0x801a899c in db_fncall (dummy1=Variable dummy1 is not
available.
) at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:516
#2 0x801a8ecf in db_command
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangbsd/
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangbsd/
On Thursday 04 June 2009 5:24:07 am Menshikov Konstantin wrote:
Hi.
My system FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE periodically freeze.
I`m compiling kernel with WITNESS and get backtrace.
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195
#1 0x801a899c in db_fncall (dummy1=Variable dummy1 is not
available.
) at
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
installed
as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
You might want to
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 04 June 2009 5:24:07 am Menshikov Konstantin wrote:
Hi.
My system FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE periodically freeze.
I`m compiling kernel with WITNESS and get backtrace.
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195
#1 0x801a899c in db_fncall (dummy1=Variable dummy1 is not
Is there any document describing how to configure Eclipse for style(9)
compliance?
Eclipse is the official IDE of the project I'm working on. We use code
taken from FreeBSD, making some changes that my company plans to
contribute back, so I'd like to keep the formatting compliant to
style(9). The
Menshikov Konstantin wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday 04 June 2009 5:24:07 am Menshikov Konstantin wrote:
Hi.
My system FreeBSD 7.1 RELEASE periodically freeze.
I`m compiling kernel with WITNESS and get backtrace.
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195
#1 0x801a899c in db_fncall
Dear fellow hackers,
since jail can be bound on multiple IP addresses I tend to clone
multiple loopback interfaces and add one loopback address to each jail
cloned_interfaces=lo1 lo2 lo3
ifconfig_lo1_alias0=inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 0x
ifconfig_lo2_alias0=inet 127.0.0.3 netmask 0x
However, grep -R 127.0.0.1 /etc reveals, that sendmail in many places
assumes localhost to be on 127.0.0.1 instead of looking it up in
/etc/hosts or using 127.0.0.0/8 to identify a local connection.
calling 127.0.0.1 from jail always loops back within jail. it's all fine.
I worry that more
Thanks to the team for this!
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:38, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
installed
as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
You might want to mention that a few parts are still GCC-compiled due
to bugs in Clang ( see
Hi, Dirk
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Engling erdge...@erdgeist.org wrote:
Dear fellow hackers,
since jail can be bound on multiple IP addresses I tend to clone
multiple loopback interfaces and add one loopback address to each jail
cloned_interfaces=lo1 lo2 lo3
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but it
doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html).
In what way does it not interact correctly?
Kai Wang wrote a new
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Dirk Engling wrote:
Hi,
However, grep -R 127.0.0.1 /etc reveals, that sendmail in many places
assumes localhost to be on 127.0.0.1 instead of looking it up in
/etc/hosts or using 127.0.0.0/8 to identify a local connection.
or possibly other methods that would find even
If programmers assume 127.0.0.1 is hte one and only loopback it's
because of two things - 1) this has been done in the very old days
where people updated the hosts file with uucp to know all hosts in the
nwetwork and was never updated. or 2) they are clueless or lazy.
To avoid being labeled
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
If programmers assume 127.0.0.1 is hte one and only loopback it's
because of two things - 1) this has been done in the very old days
where people updated the hosts file with uucp to know all hosts in the
nwetwork and was never updated. or 2) they are
8.12.7/8.12.7 2002/12/29
yes, that's not from stone age:(
Well, the way things move, it almost is. :)
Have you ever thought about having those files changed just for
FreeBSD? Or had there been porblems on FreeBSD systems with localhost
as well?
Now that you mention it, we are already
I'll check with Claus to see if he remembers.
Claus still had the mail archive from back then. It was my scenario.
Specifically, Linux systems with certain versions of glibc would append
the domain/search in /etc/resolv.conf causing localhost lookups to
possibly return offsite systems. This
Now that you mention it, we are already using separate FreeBSD files in
src/etc/sendmail/freebsd{,.submit}.mc so I can do something different
for FreeBSD. I think we are still in code slush and not freeze for 8.0.
I'll double check and if so, make the change tonight (with a note in
20 matches
Mail list logo
