On 2009-06-23 17:47:26, Marcus Reid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a side note, freebsd-hackers is not the correct list for this question.
I considered it a hackers@ question due to the large "ZFS is an experimental
feature" warning.
xw
___
freebsd-hackers@freebs
:Hello
:
:This is regarding the dump utility cache efficiency analysis post made on
:February '07 by Peter Jeremy [
:http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2007-February/019666.html]
:and if this project is still open. I would be interested to begin exploring
:FreeBSD (and contributing)
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:06:18PM +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
> I'm converting my port samesame to use gnu configue, but came a cross a
> problem that is beond me. I'm able to run aclocal, autoconf, autoheader
> and automake --add-missing -c. I've read the docs for autoconf and
> automake and se
Hello
This is regarding the dump utility cache efficiency analysis post made on
February '07 by Peter Jeremy [
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2007-February/019666.html]
and if this project is still open. I would be interested to begin exploring
FreeBSD (and contributing) by sta
> On 2009-Jun-13 15:55:29 -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> >Adding a SIL3112A gives us the SATA.
>
> These are known to cause data corruption (check the archives). I
> wouldn't trust anything that has passed through a SIL chip without
> independent validation.
Well, as I originally stated, that wasn't
>i have pentium 200 with that card. doing ftp from other machine, getting
>3.5MB/s (HDD can 10MB/s, DMA) having 45%-55% interrupt load.
I had the same probelm. I rebuilt the kernel with the POLLING option
set to ON and turned on polling for all network interfaces. It helped
much :)
Best regards,
On 2009-Jun-22 13:12:08 +0200, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>i know all this, but i'm asking why processing single interrupt takes
>4 CPU cycles.
All I can suggest is that you browse the sources and see what the
rl(4) interrupt handler does. If you want to dig further, hwpmc(4)
may give you furt
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Any help on direction to solve this?
>
> try fdisk -B /dev/ad0
>
> but even better next time don't make slices, only disklabel. It just
> make life simpler. I still don't understand why sysinstall by default
> create them. It should be only used when
I have a remote server that was dd copied from one hard drive to another -
essentially the same size. The disk device name (ad4) is the same but the
geometry for the new drive has a CHS of 969021/16/63
On booting it hangs at:
F1FreeBSD
Boot: F1
I copied the MBR with 'boot0cfg -B -o
9 matches
Mail list logo