on 22/06/2010 01:00 Navdeep Parhar said the following:
>
> I'm not so sure about this. There is code inside the second switch that runs
> whether sh_size is 0 or not. Either all of it is pointless code (when sh_size
> is 0) or or you'll make sure that it still runs, right?
It's definitely point
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:34:49AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/06/2010 23:44 Navdeep Parhar said the following:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:10:45PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On Monday 21 June 2010 11:57:17 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>> on 21/06/2010 18:43 John Baldwin said the follow
on 21/06/2010 23:44 Navdeep Parhar said the following:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:10:45PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday 21 June 2010 11:57:17 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 21/06/2010 18:43 John Baldwin said the following:
np@ has a patch to gdb to fix this for kgdb. I haven't comm
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 07:25:10PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <201006211109.11653@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
> >On Saturday 19 June 2010 11:48:22 am Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>
> >> As an example here is md(4) converted to use
> >> alloc_unr() / alloc_unr_specific():
> >
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:10:45PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 21 June 2010 11:57:17 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 21/06/2010 18:43 John Baldwin said the following:
> > > np@ has a patch to gdb to fix this for kgdb. I haven't committed it as
> > > it
> > > patched gdb internals and wa
On Monday 21 June 2010 11:57:17 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/06/2010 18:43 John Baldwin said the following:
> > np@ has a patch to gdb to fix this for kgdb. I haven't committed it as it
> > patched gdb internals and wasn't in a kgdb-specific place, but I'm not
sure of
> > a better way to fix
In message <201006211109.11653@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes:
>On Saturday 19 June 2010 11:48:22 am Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>> As an example here is md(4) converted to use
>> alloc_unr() / alloc_unr_specific():
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jh/patches/md-alloc_unr.diff
>
>This soun
Hi,
As I understand, there are 2 flavors of the Marvel Yukon driver. One is for
Yukon-I devices, and is called skgeinit, and other is for Yukon-II devices and
called sky2 driver.
Looking at the release notes for 7.0, it looks like this driver which was in
sys/dev/yukon, is now present as the m
on 21/06/2010 18:43 John Baldwin said the following:
> np@ has a patch to gdb to fix this for kgdb. I haven't committed it as it
> patched gdb internals and wasn't in a kgdb-specific place, but I'm not sure
> of
> a better way to fix kgdb.
Oh, yes, section mapping is done in common gdb code.
P
On Monday 21 June 2010 10:39:08 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> I've noticed that on amd64 addresses (sh_addr) of all sections in a kernel
module
> are zeros.
> This is unlike kernel itself and i386 modules.
>
> Kernel linker maps SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_NOBITS sections sequentially
starting at a
> cer
On Saturday 19 June 2010 11:48:22 am Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a patch to extend the kernel unit number allocator for
> allocating specific unit numbers. The patch adds a new function
> alloc_unr_specific() which returns the requested unit number if it is
> free and -1 if the num
I've noticed that on amd64 addresses (sh_addr) of all sections in a kernel
module
are zeros.
This is unlike kernel itself and i386 modules.
Kernel linker maps SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_NOBITS sections sequentially starting
at a
certain base address and taking into account their sizes and alignment
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > >
> > > > csup already has a CVS mode, at least in 9-current. I don't use older
> > > > versions of FreeBSD so I don't know whether it supports CVS there.
> > >
> > > It does at least down to 7.x.
> >
> > High time to fix this botheration, isn't it?
> >
>
> This has
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:41:58AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 21 June 2010 10:11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stathis Kamperis
> > wrote:
> >> 2010/6/21 Garrett Cooper :
> >>> Err... I ran an mqueue test and it popped up with ENOSYS. Which
> >>> makes me
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:45:17 +0700
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> >
> > > csup already has a CVS mode, at least in 9-current. I don't use older
> > > versions of FreeBSD so I don't know whether it supports CVS there.
> >
> > It does at least down to 7.x.
>
> High time t
15 matches
Mail list logo