on 23/08/2010 02:52 Artem Belevich said the following:
Do you by any chance have a graph showing kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.size
behavior in addition to the stuff included on your graphs now?
Yes, I do and not by a chance :-)
All I
can tell from your graphs is that v_free_count+v_cache_count
Ah! After re-reading your first email and I think I've finally got
what you're saying -- with your change ARC would only start giving up
memory when pagedaemon is awake. Presumably once it's awake it will
also run through inactive list pushing some of it to cache. On the
other hand existing code
on 23/08/2010 10:28 Artem Belevich said the following:
If we could also deal with zone fragmentation issue you've written in
another thread, that should bring ZFS even closer to being usable
without shaman-style (the one with lots of muttering, swearing and
dancing around) tuning.
Actually,
Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au writes:
They're LPC ISA devices, I don't know if they appear in any PNP or
ACPI tables though.
Same issue with ichwd: ISTR there is actually supposed to be an entry
for it in an ACPI table, but on the motherboard I had when I tested it
before I committed
* Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:
could you please upload the resulting ISO so that people who don't
want to create it themselves can test your CD?
Prrr... I have a horrible internet connection and the resulting ISO is
about 600 MB big. I'll see what I can do.
--
Ed Schouten
Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au wrote:
On 23/08/2010, at 1:24, Xin LI wrote:
2010/8/7 Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav d...@des.no:
Xin LI delp...@delphij.net writes:
I'm still polishing up the driver, there seems to be no way to
figure out the base port address directly (datasheet said it's
Quoting Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl:
Hello all,
A couple of major releases ago, we had a FreeBSD disc1.iso which also
included the livefs. Nowadays the livefs comes on a separate disc. This
livefs disc has a couple of issues in my opinion:
- The livefs disc does not feature any installsets,
Hi all,
Per Lars's request I've uploaded an ISO of the FreeBSD live CD for
amd64:
URL:http://people.freebsd.org/~ed/FreeBSD-9.0-CURRENT-201008-amd64-ed.iso.xz
Size: 422452056 bytes (403 MB)
SHA256: e0b7ac8eac713ecd5ccdbf107c80563260e6000b27838b003ca11a42ae6ae700
Have fun!
--
Ed
On Friday, August 20, 2010 10:14:46 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
Currently the code in identcpu.c does a check for a specific cpu
value extension. This is set to 0x8004 (even though the
corresponding code below iterates through 0x8002:0x8005):
It does not invoke 0x8005 (,
On Friday, August 20, 2010 1:13:53 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
Consider the following modules:
/* first.c */
static int *test;
int
test_function(void)
{
return *test;
}
static int
first_modevent(struct module *m, int what, void *arg)
{
int err = 0;
switch (what) {
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Domagoj S. rank1see...@gmail.com writes:
8.1 RELEASE 32bit
# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
As per: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/changes.html
core2 is supported
It's not! `core' and `core2' for
on 23/08/2010 15:10 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, August 20, 2010 1:13:53 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
Consider the following modules:
/* first.c */
static int *test;
int
test_function(void)
{
return *test;
}
static int
first_modevent(struct module *m, int what, void *arg)
On Monday, August 23, 2010 11:04:20 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/08/2010 15:10 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, August 20, 2010 1:13:53 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
Consider the following modules:
/* first.c */
static int *test;
int
test_function(void)
{
return *test;
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:07 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 20, 2010 10:14:46 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
Currently the code in identcpu.c does a check for a specific cpu
value extension. This is set to 0x8004 (even though the
corresponding code below
2010/8/23 Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua:
on 23/08/2010 15:10 John Baldwin said the following:
On Friday, August 20, 2010 1:13:53 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
Consider the following modules:
/* first.c */
static int *test;
int
test_function(void)
{
return *test;
}
static int
On Thursday 19 August 2010 12:48 am, Oleg Sharoyko wrote:
On 16 August 2010 22:21, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
In theory, we can shadow video ROM and execute it in emulation
*iff* it actually contains x86 real mode code. It won't be too
hard but I am not sure whether it is worth
On 08/23/2010 03:28, Artem Belevich wrote:
Can anyone test the patch on a system with mix of UFS/ZFS filesystems
and see if the change mitigates or solves the issue with inactive
memory excessively backpressuring ARC.
I have a system currently patched up to ZFSv15 and mm@'s metaslab patch
On 08/23/2010 16:42, jhell wrote:
On 08/23/2010 03:28, Artem Belevich wrote:
Can anyone test the patch on a system with mix of UFS/ZFS filesystems
and see if the change mitigates or solves the issue with inactive
memory excessively backpressuring ARC.
I have a system currently patched up to
From: Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com
I have, for longer than I can count, create my own livecds because the media
that's produced have a shortcoming for some reason or other.
I automated my own build from sources (not .iso) of combined install
+ live CDROMs, a frighteningly long time ago:
My top
Could you try following experiments before and after the patch while
monitoring kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.size and
vm.stats.vm.v_inactive_count.
First prepare the data.
* You'll need some files totalling around the amount of physical
memory on your box. Multiple copies of /usr/src should do the
On 08/23/2010 22:10, Artem Belevich wrote:
First prepare the data.
* You'll need some files totalling around the amount of physical
memory on your box. Multiple copies of /usr/src should do the trick.
* Place one copy on UFS filesystem and another on ZFS
Experiment #1:
* Prime ARC by
In message: 201008171615.21103@freebsd.org
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org writes:
: So more or less it's for BIOSes with ISA that doesn't feature plug
: and play (286s, 386s, some 486s?)? Just trying to fill in the gap :).
:
: Yes, it may perhaps still be useful for some x86
In message: 20100819170643.38362078@dlink.ua
Alexandr Rybalko r...@dlink.ua writes:
: On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:18:46 -0400
: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
:
: On Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:38:05 am Alexandr Rybalko wrote:
: Hi all,
:
: Can someone say, how `make` in
23 matches
Mail list logo
