on 19/09/2010 01:16 Jeff Roberson said the following:
Not specifically in reaction to Robert's comment but I would like to add my
thoughts to this notion of resource balancing in buckets. I really prefer not
to do any specific per-zone tuning except in extreme cases. This is because
quite
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:14:46PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:46:51AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
I have no objection, but think we should cave in and investigate the
possibility of using linker script wrapping libc.so in FreeBSD-9.0:
on 19/09/2010 11:27 Jeff Roberson said the following:
I don't like this because even with very large buffers you can still have high
enough turnover to require per-cpu caching. Kip specifically added UMA
support
to address this issue in zfs. If you have allocations which don't require
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/09/2010 01:16 Jeff Roberson said the following:
Not specifically in reaction to Robert's comment but I would like to add my
thoughts to this notion of resource balancing in buckets. I really prefer not
to do any specific per-zone tuning except in
On 19 Sep 2010, at 09:21, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I believe the combination of these approaches would significantly solve the
problem and should be relatively little new code. It should also preserve
the
adaptable nature of the system without penalizing resource heavy systems. I
would be
On 19 Sep 2010, at 09:42, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/09/2010 11:27 Jeff Roberson said the following:
I don't like this because even with very large buffers you can still have
high
enough turnover to require per-cpu caching. Kip specifically added UMA
support
to address this issue in zfs.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:01:04AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
GNU binutils has recently (well, March 2009) added a -D
(deterministic) argument to ar(1) which sets the timestamp, uid,
and gid to zero, and the mode to 644.
That argument was added based on discussions on NetBSD about doing
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 10:14:06AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:14:46PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:46:51AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
I have no objection, but think we should cave in and investigate the
8 matches
Mail list logo