pf

2010-09-26 Thread Samuel Martín Moro
Hello, I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64). I used the sample configuration file available on calomelhttps://calomel.org/pf_config.html After a few tests, it appears that the gate has fully access to the internet, but I can't open connections from clients to

Re: pf

2010-09-26 Thread Samuel Martín Moro
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.comwrote: Samuel Martín Moro wrote: Hello, I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64). I used the sample configuration file available on calomelhttps://calomel.org/pf_config.html After

Re: pf

2010-09-26 Thread jhell
This is more for questions@ or pf@ On 09/26/2010 11:43, Samuel Martín Moro wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.comwrote: Samuel Martín Moro wrote: Hello, I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64). I used the sample

adding a new lib for more advanced argument parsing

2010-09-26 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, looking at applications such as geom (g_*), camcontrol, etc. makes one realise that getopt(3) is clearly not suitable for handling such complex options. camcontrol.c even contains a whole paragraph about why getopt(3) is considered not appropriate to handle camcontrol's argument parsing

csup or svn

2010-09-26 Thread Aryeh Friedman
I currently use: csup -h cvsup9.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile and when I just ran it I got: Append to CVSROOT-src/access Edit CVSROOT-src/access,v Segmentation fault (core dumped) (8.1-STABLE #0) Should I be using SVN instead and if so what is the repo URL I need to

Re: csup or svn

2010-09-26 Thread jhell
On 09/26/2010 22:47, Aryeh Friedman wrote: I currently use: csup -h cvsup9.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile and when I just ran it I got: Append to CVSROOT-src/access Edit CVSROOT-src/access,v Segmentation fault (core dumped) (8.1-STABLE #0) Should I be

Re: csup or svn

2010-09-26 Thread Aryeh Friedman
Isn't that a step backwards? On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Lewis gle...@eyesbeyond.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:34:34PM -0400, jhell wrote: On 09/26/2010 22:47, Aryeh Friedman wrote: I currently use: csup -h cvsup9.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile

Re: csup or svn

2010-09-26 Thread Greg Lewis
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:34:34PM -0400, jhell wrote: On 09/26/2010 22:47, Aryeh Friedman wrote: I currently use: csup -h cvsup9.us.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile and when I just ran it I got: Append to CVSROOT-src/access Edit CVSROOT-src/access,v

Re: adding a new lib for more advanced argument parsing

2010-09-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 20100927012936.ga32...@freebsd.org Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org writes: : hi there, : : looking at applications such as geom (g_*), camcontrol, etc. makes one realise : that getopt(3) is clearly not suitable for handling such complex options. : camcontrol.c even

scheduler modifications

2010-09-26 Thread Eknath Venkataramani
I want to modify the priorities are assigned for the timesharing class of processes. How do I do that? ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: adding a new lib for more advanced argument parsing

2010-09-26 Thread perryh
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: ... getopt(3) is clearly not suitable for handling such complex options. camcontrol.c even contains a whole paragraph about why getopt(3) is considered not appropriate to handle camcontrol's argument parsing requirements ... why not do a vendor