On 5/16/12 5:42 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
All
I am setting up 3 sun x4440 with freebsd 7.3 amd64 . The severs have 4x 4-core opterons and 128G
of ram each . Once the servers boot they are a good fit for what we are doing and preform well .
The odd thing I am seeing is a long delay in boot up .
2011/5/13 Zafer Aydoğan za...@aydogan.de:
2011/5/13 Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com:
On (12/05/2011 22:45), Zafer Aydoğan wrote:
Hello List,
I've set up an OpenGrok service for the FreeBSD sources (current).
OpenGrok is a source code search engine and cross reference.
I'm updating the
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:36 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a 4 GB or ram, so why kernel panic with my MD ROOT, if larger then
~40 MB?
I've tried to split up root in 20MB image and usr in 160 MB
Via loader.conf root becomes md0 and usr md1 and panic occurs even when
Zafer Aydoğan wrote:
Hmm... there seems to be very little interest so far.
FWIW, I find this tool useful, but since it's most helpful when you
need to dig into a previously unknown portion of code, which doesn't
happen that often, it's reasonable to expect infrequent usage -- don't
mistake that
2011/5/17 Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com:
Zafer Aydoğan wrote:
Hmm... there seems to be very little interest so far.
FWIW, I find this tool useful, but since it's most helpful when you
need to dig into a previously unknown portion of code, which doesn't
happen that often, it's reasonable
On 17 May 2012 01:34, Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
All
I am setting up 3 sun x4440 with freebsd 7.3 amd64 . The severs have 4x
4-core opterons and 128G of ram each . Once the servers boot they are a good
fit for what we are doing and preform well . The odd thing I am seeing is a
On 5/17/11 1:35 AM, Zafer Aydoğan wrote:
2011/5/13 Zafer Aydoğanza...@aydogan.de:
Zafer.
Hmm... there seems to be very little interest so far.
Although this tool is mainly useful for developers,
what is the correct mailing list to announce it ?
The service seems to be good but most people
Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
jail. After I groaned about the security implication of this, I noted
that there is a sysctl that looks like it should allow this. Namely,
security.jail.mount_allowed. I noted that setting this follows a path
that *should*
On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:40 -0700 Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
jail. After I groaned about the security implication of this, I noted
that there is a sysctl that looks like it should allow this. Namely,
On 5/17/11 1:17 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:40 -0700 Sean Brunosean...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Silly thing I ran into today. User wanted to NFS mount a dir inside a
jail. After I groaned about the security implication of this, I noted
that there is a sysctl that
On Tue, 17 May 2011, krad wrote:
On 17 May 2012 01:34, Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org wrote:
All
I am setting up 3 sun x4440 with freebsd 7.3 amd64 . The severs have 4x
4-core opterons and 128G of ram each . Once the servers boot they are a good
fit for what we are doing and preform well .
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP
To: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de,
H Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com, Asit K Mallick
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:03:07AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fenghua Yu fenghua...@intel.com
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP
To: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu, Thomas Gleixner
13 matches
Mail list logo
