Re: Active slice, only for a next boot

2011-05-30 Thread Dieter BSD
I have i.e; 3 slices, of which first is active. Now I wana set slice 2 active, but only for a one/next boot. Once slice 2 is booted and system is shutdown or rebooted, once again, first slice is active and booted, without user's intervention. I think that setting the active slice is the wrong

Re: compiler warnings (was: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes)

2011-05-30 Thread Dieter BSD
maybe we find some nice -Wwarning options which are reasonable to have -Wmissing-declarations -Wimplicit FreeBSD's gcc doesn't seem to have  -Wcoercion  ??? Bugzilla indicates that it was added years ago (2006?). It would be really really nice if -static worked on (nearly) everything. and -

Re: compiler warnings (was: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes)

2011-05-30 Thread Chris Rees
On 30 May 2011 18:44, Dieter BSD dieter...@engineer.com wrote: maybe we find some nice -Wwarning options which are reasonable to have -Wmissing-declarations -Wimplicit FreeBSD's gcc doesn't seem to have  -Wcoercion  ??? Bugzilla indicates that it was added years ago (2006?). It would be

Re: compiler warnings (was: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes)

2011-05-30 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon May 30 11, Dieter BSD wrote: maybe we find some nice -Wwarning options which are reasonable to have -Wmissing-declarations -Wimplicit FreeBSD's gcc doesn't seem to have  -Wcoercion  ??? Bugzilla indicates that it was added years ago (2006?). -Wcoercion seems to have only been a

Re: compiler warnings (was: Re: [rfc] a few kern.mk and bsd.sys.mk related changes)

2011-05-30 Thread Dieter BSD
Chris writes: Ports need attention. The warnings I get there are frightening. I find it comforting that they're just that: warnings. How do they frighten you? High quality code does not have any warnings. The most frightening thing is the attitute that They're just warnings, so I'll ignore

Re: Freebsd on the sun x4440

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Saad
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote: Hi, I would like to suggest to try 8.2. It is my experience that the different version behave very different on the same hardware. It does not mean that the newer version is the better. As an example, I

Mount_nfs question

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Saad
Hello All So I am stumped on this one. I want to know what the IP of each nfs server that is providing each nfs export. I am running 7.4-RELEASE When I run mount -t nfs I see something like this VIP-01:/export/source on /mnt/src VIP-02:/export/target on /mnt/target

Re: Mount_nfs question

2011-05-30 Thread Rick Macklem
Hello All So I am stumped on this one. I want to know what the IP of each nfs server that is providing each nfs export. I am running 7.4-RELEASE When I run mount -t nfs I see something like this VIP-01:/export/source on /mnt/src VIP-02:/export/target on /mnt/target VIP-01:/export/logs on

Re: Mount_nfs question

2011-05-30 Thread Mark Saad
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote: Hello All So I am stumped on this one. I want to know what the IP of each nfs server that is providing each nfs export. I am running 7.4-RELEASE When I run mount -t nfs I see something like this VIP-01:/export/source

Re: Mount_nfs question

2011-05-30 Thread Thiago Damas
Maybe you can use showmount -a SERVER-IP, foreach server you have... Thiago 2011/5/30 Mark Saad nones...@longcount.org: On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote: Hello All So I am stumped on this one. I want to know what the IP of each nfs server that is