Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:34:38PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
from the diskless:
els-01# ifconfig
vr0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=8280bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,WOL_UCAST,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE
ether 00:0d:b9:22:57:18
inet
Patch below changes ps(1) to automatically size column widths according to their
contents. From the user point of view, it prevents breaking layout with too
wide values
and in most cases makes output narrower. From the developer point of view, it
removes
the need to specify widths. Testing is
Edward Tomasz Napierała tr...@freebsd.org writes:
Patch below changes ps(1) to automatically size column widths according to
their
contents. From the user point of view, it prevents breaking layout with too
wide values
and in most cases makes output narrower. From the developer point of
Found some datasheets (programming docs) and board schematics for
Silicon Image storage controllers. Since they don't seem to be
publicly available, perhaps some of these docs will be useful.
Bcc'd relevant fs and hackers lists. Reply to hardware I guess.
# Overview
Hi.
I'm a student and some time ago I started investigating a bit about
the performance/fragmentation issue of large allocations within the
UMA allocator.
Benckmarks showed up that this problems of performances are mainly
related to the fact that every call to uma_large_malloc() results in a
call
I am trying to run this dtrace script:
#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s
pid123:libc::entry
{
self-timestmp[probefunc] = timestmp;
}
pid123:libc::return
/self-timestmp[probefunc] != 0/
{
@function_duration[probefunc] = sum(timestmp - self-timestmp[probefunc]);
timestmp[probefunc] = 0;
}
which I got from
6 matches
Mail list logo