Hi,
I posted this question in -Questions about a week ago, and didn't get any
replies :(
I'm just trying to check - we have a number of 8.2-STABLE amd64 systems
where the onboard RAID shows up as '/dev/ar0' (which we use for
filesystems, i.e. /dev/ar0s1d et'al), and the underlying devices
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:28:37 -0500, Karl Pielorz kpielorz_...@tdx.co.uk
wrote:
Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying
adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use?
Yes. :-)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Works excellent!
I boot it from USB stick.
Now I added ~150 MB of ports to it.
From that point on, it doesn't boot on all machines.
Booting 2 times in a row on laptop with 4 gb ram:
http://www.starforce.biz/md_root_1.jpg
http://www.starforce.biz/md_root_2.jpg
Without ports, it did booted fine!
2011/8/31 Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:11 -0700, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 29.8.2011. 20:15, John Baldwin wrote:
However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an issue
like
this, it doesn't hang. Something else later in the boot must have
On 9/1/2011 8:17 AM, rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
Works excellent!
I boot it from USB stick.
Now I added ~150 MB of ports to it.
From that point on, it doesn't boot on all machines.
Booting 2 times in a row on laptop with 4 gb ram:
http://www.starforce.biz/md_root_1.jpg
--On 01 September 2011 07:45 -0500 Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying
adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use?
Yes. :-)
Thanks :-) I'll look for other reasons why one of the machines mysteriously
locked up with everything
On 1 September 2011 16:11, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
I mean, if we have 2 cpus in a machine, but MAXCPU is set to 256, there
is a bunch of lost memory and higher levels of lock contention?
I thought that attilio was taking a stab at enhancing this, but at the
current time
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc: rank1see...@gmail.com, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:24:01 -0400
Subject: Re: BUG: Entries in fstab with 'late' option, require order, with ntfs
and ufs
On
Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on
the Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. This is
for FreeBSD
FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2
per uname -a.
We have a FreeBSD based product on the AMD64 architecture; I'm trying to
2011/9/1 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
On 1 September 2011 16:11, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
I mean, if we have 2 cpus in a machine, but MAXCPU is set to 256, there
is a bunch of lost memory and higher levels of lock contention?
I thought that attilio was taking a stab at
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martin crmar...@sgi.com wrote:
Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the
Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. This is for
FreeBSD
FreeBSD psmdev1 8.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2
per uname -a.
On 2011-09-01 11:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martincrmar...@sgi.com wrote:
Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the
Free kernel I'm a horrid noob so I guess it makes sense. This is for
FreeBSD
FreeBSD psmdev1
okay, dmesg begins to give a clue. Here's a question: if this FreeBSD 8
is being built on a FreeBSD 7 machine, would that account for it?
On 2011-09-01 11:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martincrmar...@sgi.com wrote:
Okay, I'll grant this is probably a
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Charlie Martin crmar...@sgi.com wrote:
okay, dmesg begins to give a clue. Here's a question: if this FreeBSD 8 is
being built on a FreeBSD 7 machine, would that account for it?
The problem is that you only have built some -- not all -- of the
modules
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Charlie Martin crmar...@sgi.com wrote:
On 2011-09-01 11:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Charlie Martincrmar...@sgi.com wrote:
Okay, I'll grant this is probably a horrid noob question, but then on the
Free kernel I'm a horrid noob
15 matches
Mail list logo
