On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:11:45 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2
This includes experimental OpenMP support and PathDB.
On 2011-Sep-07 12:41:54 -0600, Manish Vachharajani
mani...@lineratesystems.com wrote:
This is great info, thanks. Is it worth having some kind of
environment variable tunable (or even compile time tunable) to have a
fast gettimeofday then?
Maybe. rwatson@ produced a preloadable .so to do this
That's correct. This is actually part of a larger effort to open up the MIPS
code to a range of new bootstraps. Some bootstraps use the bootinfo facility
extensively. It's an easy way to pass some simple information to the kernel
without the clutter of metadata and other such things.
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 6:25:23 pm Peter Grehan wrote:
I'm proposing an extension framework for the bootinfo structure used
to pass information from the bootstrap/loader to the kernel. Although
I'm only proposing this for the MIPS bootinfo, it's completely
applicable to any of
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 6:48:19 pm Peter Wemm wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm proposing an extension framework for the bootinfo structure used
to pass information from the bootstrap/loader to the kernel. Although
I'm only proposing
what version of chromium are you using?
I use chromium-13.0.782.215 on amd64 8.2-stable, the gettimeofday call is
far less than 2 per second, about 20 per second, but I notice old
version has this bug, but latest version has fixed it. Maybe you should
update your chromium and try again.
On Fri Sep 9 11, Paul Ambrose wrote:
what version of chromium are you using?
I use chromium-13.0.782.215 on amd64 8.2-stable, the gettimeofday call is
far less than 2 per second, about 20 per second, but I notice old
version has this bug, but latest version has fixed it. Maybe you should
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2
This includes experimental OpenMP support and
Firefox 5 and 6 has more gettimeofday call than 2 per second on my
amd64-8.2-stable box.
i don't see why chromium needs
to call gettimeofday(2) or any library function that triggers it more
than 3000 times a second.
What the BLEEP are web browsers doing that they need the clock
so
On 09/ 9/11 10:53 PM, arrowdodger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kimj...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2
This
On Friday 09 September 2011 11:53 am, arrowdodger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org
wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
On Friday 09 September 2011 12:49 pm, C. Bergström wrote:
On 09/ 9/11 10:53 PM, arrowdodger wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Jung-uk Kimj...@freebsd.org
wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
On Fri Sep 9 11, Dieter BSD wrote:
Firefox 5 and 6 has more gettimeofday call than 2 per second on my
amd64-8.2-stable box.
i don't see why chromium needs
to call gettimeofday(2) or any library function that triggers it more
than 3000 times a second.
What the BLEEP are web
On Fri Sep 9 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Sep 9 11, Dieter BSD wrote:
Firefox 5 and 6 has more gettimeofday call than 2 per second on my
amd64-8.2-stable box.
i don't see why chromium needs
to call gettimeofday(2) or any library function that triggers it more
than 3000
On Thursday 08 September 2011 06:11 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I have done preliminary porting work of PathScale's open-sourced
EKOPath Compiler Suite (https://github.com/pathscale).
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel.tar.bz2
I just uploaded a new tarball, ekopath-devel-20110909.bz2
I just uploaded a new tarball, ekopath-devel-20110909.bz2.
The real path is
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ekopath-devel-20110909.tar.bz2
Sorry for the typo.
Jung-uk Kim
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
16 matches
Mail list logo