On 21/02/2013, at 9:06, "Steven Hartland" wrote:
>> If I change the console redirect to com1, my screen stays blank. Would
>> you perhaps know how to use com1 for redirect and connect to it using
>> ipmi-console (or ipmi-tool)?
>
> We use the following on Supermicro servers works fine:-
> http:
On 20 February 2013 12:01, Mark Saad wrote:
> Xin
> I am rebuilding now, I'll let you know how it works.
As I've said before, if someone wants to take ownership of 6.x and
backport changes / push them into STABLE_6, be my guest. Yahoo was
doing that for some unsupported old releases for a while.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 20-02-2013 16:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base
>>> addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine)
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Schenkeveld"
To: "Daniel O'Connor"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:31 PM
Subject: IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server]
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55:47PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 20/0
On 20/02/2013 20:31, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55:47PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>> On 20/02/2013, at 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
What about getting a remote console like HP's ILO or Dell's DRAC ?
You get to login remotely, you can us
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:51:37PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 20-02-2013 16:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base
> >> addresses (https://wiki.freeb
On 20-02-2013 16:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base
>> addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently
>> lacks.
>>
>> I've written a pat
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55:47PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 20/02/2013, at 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> >> What about getting a remote console like HP's ILO or Dell's DRAC ?
> >>
> >> You get to login remotely, you can use some degree of access control...
> >> you ca
Xin
I am rebuilding now, I'll let you know how it works.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/20/13 09:29, Mark Saad wrote:
> > All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc
> > applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:04:14AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> The process should be stopped by the time we dump a core, so running it
> multiple times should be ok in that the sizes should not change. I would
> say that you should try to implement a "determine sizes" pass that doesn't
> allocat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/20/13 09:29, Mark Saad wrote:
> All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc
> applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the
> 6-STABLE branch ?
The patch itself won't apply, there were many changes after th
My point was, unless someone ports the patch back to 6 , if 6 is indeed
affected, I think you're out of luck.
I hope you get your answer and, possibly, a patch.
On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
> I am aware its EOL'd but there are still a number of us stuck with 6-STABLE
> .
>
>
I am aware its EOL'd but there are still a number of us stuck with 6-STABLE
.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Fleuriot Damien wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup
>
> 6 has been EOL for a looong time.
>
> So hmmm, guessing you won't see a patch.
>
>
>
> On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:29 PM, M
http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup
6 has been EOL for a looong time.
So hmmm, guessing you won't see a patch.
On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Mark Saad wrote:
> All
> I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc applies to
> FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the
All
I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc applies to
FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the 6-STABLE branch ?
--
mark saad | nones...@longcount.org
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:50:54 pm Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:31:43PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > BTW, one off-ball thought I have is that I would like to have a mode where
> > libprocstat operates on a core file (of a process, not a kernel crash
> > dump),
> >
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:49:52 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Baldwin"
>
> Thanks for the feedback John appreciated, a couple of questions inline
> below if you would be so kind.
Certainly.
> > - Is dump_config() really the right choice for 'foreig
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base
> addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently
> lacks.
>
> I've written a patch to the dynamic loader (/libexec/ld-elf.so.1) that
>
Hi
Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base
addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently
lacks.
I've written a patch to the dynamic loader (/libexec/ld-elf.so.1) that
loads libraries at their preferred base addresses
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer
On 20/02/2013, at 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
>> What about getting a remote console like HP's ILO or Dell's DRAC ?
>>
>> You get to login remotely, you can use some degree of access control... you
>> can even remote boot.
>
> For new hardware I could indeed use this, the current hardware d
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:47:36AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
> On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:46, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:42:57AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >> Just a thought with no working example butâ¦
> >>
> >> bootp / tftp - from a remote secured manage
On target provider I had 20971440 free sectors, each of 512 B.
That would be 10485720 kB, for a last slice.
This number is valid, as it is splitable with 63, 8, 4 and 2, without any
residue.
So, upon attempt to add that slice, I get:
--
gpart: autofill: No space left on device
--
Tried both '-
On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:46, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:42:57AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>> Just a thought with no working example but…
>>
>> bootp / tftp - from a remote secured management frame to TX a key filesytem
>> to unlock your rootfs.
>>
>> Could be somet
Geli can ask for a root password at the console to unlock the root fs
but that of course won't work for a remote server.
Ideally I'd like the server to start, do minimal network config, run
a minimal ssh client (dropbear?) and wait for someone to log in,
provide the passphrase to unlock the root
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:58:10AM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to find a solution for this chicken and egg problem,
> how to have an encrypted root filesystem on a remote server.
>
> Geli can ask for a root password at the console to unlock the root fs
> but that of
25 matches
Mail list logo