Re: IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server]

2013-02-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 21/02/2013, at 9:06, "Steven Hartland" wrote: >> If I change the console redirect to com1, my screen stays blank. Would >> you perhaps know how to use com1 for redirect and connect to it using >> ipmi-console (or ipmi-tool)? > > We use the following on Supermicro servers works fine:- > http:

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 20 February 2013 12:01, Mark Saad wrote: > Xin > I am rebuilding now, I'll let you know how it works. As I've said before, if someone wants to take ownership of 6.x and backport changes / push them into STABLE_6, be my guest. Yahoo was doing that for some unsupported old releases for a while.

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On 20-02-2013 16:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base >>> addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine)

Re: IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server]

2013-02-20 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Paul Schenkeveld" To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:31 PM Subject: IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server] Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55:47PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On 20/0

Re: IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server]

2013-02-20 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 20/02/2013 20:31, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55:47PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: >> On 20/02/2013, at 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: What about getting a remote console like HP's ILO or Dell's DRAC ? You get to login remotely, you can us

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:51:37PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On 20-02-2013 16:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base > >> addresses (https://wiki.freeb

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-20 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On 20-02-2013 16:48, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> Hi >> >> Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base >> addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently >> lacks. >> >> I've written a pat

IPMI console [Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server]

2013-02-20 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
Hi Daniel, On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:55:47PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 20/02/2013, at 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > >> What about getting a remote console like HP's ILO or Dell's DRAC ? > >> > >> You get to login remotely, you can use some degree of access control... > >> you ca

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Saad
Xin I am rebuilding now, I'll let you know how it works. On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Xin Li wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 02/20/13 09:29, Mark Saad wrote: > > All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc > > applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE

Re: libprocstat(3): retrieve process command line args and environment

2013-02-20 Thread Mikolaj Golub
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:04:14AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > The process should be stopped by the time we dump a core, so running it > multiple times should be ok in that the sizes should not change. I would > say that you should try to implement a "determine sizes" pass that doesn't > allocat

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/20/13 09:29, Mark Saad wrote: > All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc > applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the > 6-STABLE branch ? The patch itself won't apply, there were many changes after th

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Fleuriot Damien
My point was, unless someone ports the patch back to 6 , if 6 is indeed affected, I think you're out of luck. I hope you get your answer and, possibly, a patch. On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Mark Saad wrote: > I am aware its EOL'd but there are still a number of us stuck with 6-STABLE > . > >

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Saad
I am aware its EOL'd but there are still a number of us stuck with 6-STABLE . On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup > > 6 has been EOL for a looong time. > > So hmmm, guessing you won't see a patch. > > > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:29 PM, M

Re: SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Fleuriot Damien
http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup 6 has been EOL for a looong time. So hmmm, guessing you won't see a patch. On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Mark Saad wrote: > All > I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc applies to > FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the

SA-13:02/libc and FreeBSD 6

2013-02-20 Thread Mark Saad
All I was wondering if anyone knows, off hand if SA-13:02/libc applies to FreeBSD 6-STABLE and if it would be committed to the 6-STABLE branch ? -- mark saad | nones...@longcount.org ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: libprocstat(3): retrieve process command line args and environment

2013-02-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:50:54 pm Mikolaj Golub wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:31:43PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > > BTW, one off-ball thought I have is that I would like to have a mode where > > libprocstat operates on a core file (of a process, not a kernel crash > > dump), > >

Re: Looking for reviewers for patch that adds foreign disk support mfiutil

2013-02-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:49:52 pm Steven Hartland wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "John Baldwin" > > Thanks for the feedback John appreciated, a couple of questions inline > below if you would be so kind. Certainly. > > - Is dump_config() really the right choice for 'foreig

Re: [patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 05:29:01PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base > addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently > lacks. > > I've written a patch to the dynamic loader (/libexec/ld-elf.so.1) that >

[patch] Wine DLL base address patches

2013-02-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Wine needs some of its libraries to be loaded at specific base addresses (https://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine), something FreeBSD currently lacks. I've written a patch to the dynamic loader (/libexec/ld-elf.so.1) that loads libraries at their preferred base addresses (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/quer

Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server

2013-02-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 20/02/2013, at 21:43, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: >> What about getting a remote console like HP's ILO or Dell's DRAC ? >> >> You get to login remotely, you can use some degree of access control... you >> can even remote boot. > > For new hardware I could indeed use this, the current hardware d

Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server

2013-02-20 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:47:36AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:46, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:42:57AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > >> Just a thought with no working example but… > >> > >> bootp / tftp - from a remote secured manage

gpart autofill

2013-02-20 Thread rank1seeker
On target provider I had 20971440 free sectors, each of 512 B. That would be 10485720 kB, for a last slice. This number is valid, as it is splitable with 63, 8, 4 and 2, without any residue. So, upon attempt to add that slice, I get: -- gpart: autofill: No space left on device -- Tried both '-

Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server

2013-02-20 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:46, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:42:57AM -0500, Jason Hellenthal wrote: >> Just a thought with no working example but… >> >> bootp / tftp - from a remote secured management frame to TX a key filesytem >> to unlock your rootfs. >> >> Could be somet

Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server

2013-02-20 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Geli can ask for a root password at the console to unlock the root fs but that of course won't work for a remote server. Ideally I'd like the server to start, do minimal network config, run a minimal ssh client (dropbear?) and wait for someone to log in, provide the passphrase to unlock the root

Re: Chicken and egg, encrypted root FS on remote server

2013-02-20 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:58:10AM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to find a solution for this chicken and egg problem, > how to have an encrypted root filesystem on a remote server. > > Geli can ask for a root password at the console to unlock the root fs > but that of