On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ravi Pokala rp_free...@mac.com wrote:
What you describe is the 'AF-512e' format - 4KB physical sectors
*emulating* 512B logical sectors. See [
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format#Advanced_Format_512e ;
http://www.idema.org/?page_id=2153 ]. With
# install
gpart create -s GPT ada1
gpart show
gpart add -i 1 -t freebsd-boot -b 40 -s 512 ada1
gpart add -i 2 -t freebsd-ufs -b 552 -s . ada1
gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr ada1
gpart bootcode -p /boot/gptboot -i 1 ada1
# for data
gpart create -s GPT ada1
gpart show
gpart add -i 1 -t
Hello;
My virtualization project (http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/) has
its project branch on svn.freebsd.org since a few months now.
Since then there was not much progress due to lack of time.
Now I am sitting on code updates that I can't commit myself.
What is necessary to get commit right to
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:58:37PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
I've found the paper I was talking about:
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/papers/20120601-dxr.pdf
It claims that our radix is able to do 6MPPS/core and it does not scale
with number of cores.
Our radix is bugly and
# uname -r
9.1-RELEASE-p7
# mount -t devfs devfs /var/jail/test/dev/
# devfs -m /var/jail/test/dev/ rule showsets
# devfs -m /var/jail/test/dev/ ruleset 4
# devfs -m /var/jail/test/dev/ rule applyset
# devfs -m /var/jail/test/dev/ rule showsets
4
# ls /var/jail/test/dev/
acpi audit
-Original Message-
From: Jia-Shiun Li jiash...@gmail.com
Date: Sunday, September 22, 2013 11:22 PM
To: Ravi Pokala rp_free...@mac.com
Cc: freebsd-hardw...@freebsd.org freebsd-hardw...@freebsd.org,
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's the state of AF-4Kn support?
On Wed, Sep 18,
On Sep 20, 2013, at 19:09 , Cedric Blancher wrote:
On 20 September 2013 17:20, Sebastian Kuzminsky s.kuzmin...@f5.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 22:06 , Patrick Dung wrote:
We at Line Rate (now F5) are developing support for 1 Gig superpages on
amd64. We're basing our work on 9.1.0 for
-Original Message-
From: rozhuk...@gmail.com
Reply-To: rozhuk...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:13 AM
To: 'Jia-Shiun Li' jiash...@gmail.com, Ravi Pokala rp_free...@mac.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardw...@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: What's the state of AF-4Kn
In the last episode (Sep 23), Jia-Shiun Li said:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ravi Pokala rp_free...@mac.com wrote:
What I'm asking about is AF-4kn - 4KB *logical* as well as physical
sectors. All the enterprise HDD vendors have told us is that AF-4Kn drives
expect data IO to be 4KB,
On 20 September 2013 08:20, Sebastian Kuzminsky s.kuzmin...@f5.com wrote:
It's transparent for the kernel: all of UMA and kmem_malloc()/kmem_free()
is backed by 1 gig superpages.
.. not entirely true, as I've found out at work. :(
-adrian
___
On Sep 23, 2013, at 15:24 , Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 20 September 2013 08:20, Sebastian Kuzminsky s.kuzmin...@f5.com wrote:
It's transparent for the kernel: all of UMA and kmem_malloc()/kmem_free() is
backed by 1 gig superpages.
.. not entirely true, as I've found out at work. :(
Can you
Hi,
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~**luigi/papers/20120601-dxr.pdfhttp://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/papers/20120601-dxr.pdf
http://www.nxlab.fer.hr/dxr/**stable_8_20120824.diffhttp://www.nxlab.fer.hr/dxr/stable_8_20120824.diff
I've tried the diff in 10-current, applied cleanly but had errors compiling
On 23 September 2013 14:30, Sebastian Kuzminsky s.kuzmin...@f5.com wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013, at 15:24 , Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 20 September 2013 08:20, Sebastian Kuzminsky s.kuzmin...@f5.com
wrote:
It's transparent for the kernel: all of UMA and
kmem_malloc()/kmem_free() is backed by 1
13 matches
Mail list logo
