In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Please complete it, let me know when you submit the PR i'll try
to get it integrated.
Ok, I submitted it:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29581
I tried to make as few changes as possible, but
still diff is quite big IMHO. And changed only
hi, there!
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
There are some gethostby_r, getnetby_r, ... etc routines in the
linuxthreads port (/usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads/files). These
came from the original linuxthreads package, and have no copyright
on them. I never researched the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
OK, with everyones help (well, waiting for the right time of day ;-)), I
was able to reproduce this. The initial threads last active time was
not getting initialized to a sane value, causing negative computations
of the threads timeslice depending on
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:BTW, concerning rfork(RFMEM). Could somebody explain me, why the
:following simple program is coredumping:
You cannot call rfork() with RFMEM directly from a C program. You
have to use assembly (has anyone created a native clone() call yet
In article 1d5c01bf5c42$1409d990$[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
You've got that backwards - fork() and vfork() can easily be implemented in
terms of rfork() [in fact, I believe all three are implemented in terms of
fork1() in the kernel]. rfork(RFMEM) means that the processes share all
memory
5 matches
Mail list logo
