architecture as Tier 1.
don't care for i386, don't use it anymore.
Is ARM really ready for tier 1?
Including the ports infrastructure?
Installation images?
Anton
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
I'm trying to debug firefox on ia64.
It segfaults on startup.
The output of "thread apply all bt" is at:
http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/ff17.gdb.log
or below.
Thanks for any hints on where to dig next.
Anton
Core was generated by `firefox'.
Program terminated with signal 11
2012, 462 out of 500 systems are linux based.
Anton
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Mike Meyer http://www.mired.org/
mwm?
Why! It's my preferred WM,
part of x11-toolkits/open-motif.
Talk about coincidences!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsu
ant, it's important to bring forward all
the important functionality that we know from the past, i.e. fdisk and
bsdlabel or their real useful equivalents well documented.
Jeff Anton
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
00056/nbconn)):
#0 0x000120248a80 in thr_kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1 0x in ?? ()
(gdb)
What can I get from this trace?
Thank you
Anton
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 15:45:35 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe
One obvious problem in FreeBSD is that committers are prosecutor,
judge and jury altogether.
As a user, I accept this.
I think if you can make a meaningful
contribution to FreeBSD developments
in the desig
did this on compaq 6715s laptop.
I had to remove the heatsink for cleaning.
I replaced the thermal paste. You can get
it for under 5 GBP.
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8
.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC1: 1
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC2: 2
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TSP: 100
GEN8>
See acpi_thermal(4)
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
___
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:20:27AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:33:17PM -0400, Brandon Falk wrote:
> > > Reverse engineering a whole driver could take a very long ti
only to discover they had
something else inside.
Can you recommend a pccard model that is guaranteed
to have a supported atheros chip inside?
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8
woven into
both the tree and the free page list. This causes terrible
problems with record scanning and eventual corruption.
I'm going to have to dig up these fixes, but presuming
I do, who should be alerted? Just file a bug? Recreation
is extreme
Following an advice from Kris, moving this to a more appropriate list.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:50:26PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:43:39AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>
> > &g
findblk disk_block_number
--
Anton Yuzhaninov.
re
behavior is maybe the best thing. This machine should only have X11
clients... Anyhow output below...
Jeff Anton
__
paris.hesiod.org:root[62]: portversion
Stale dependency: Xaw3d-1.5E_1 --> xf86dgaproto-2.0.2 -- manually run
'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force
Try see FSM server model (e. g. using libevent). If all clients served
by single thread, and signle process (using noblocking sockets) then
no locks need.
This model scale up to 50k-100k connections per host.
--
Anton Yuzhaninov.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTE
return (EINVAL);
(ssize_t) uap->len < 0
limit maximum value for uap->len to SIZE_T_MAX/2
May be this check can be removed?
It test it on FreeBSD 6.2 i386 - without this check a can map 2400 Mb
file.
Also mmap man page say, that 2 Gb limit was a documentation bug, but this
limit st
Christian Brueffer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:56:41PM +0300, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Hi Hackers,
Did anyone manage to get this card working under FreeBSD? I'm using
FreeBSD 6.1_REL0 on my laptop.
I know the /usr/ports/net-firmware/ is for IPW2100. Doesn't appear
to wo
river for linux.
Any help/tip is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Yours,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It is dangerous to be right when the government i
Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
But that would sort of defeat the whole purpose of biometric
authentication and you could really just use public keys instead
which would be a lot faster and easier than scanning your finger
at each login
information gathered by
the fingerprint reader, as a "password".
One can scan his finger only once, at first login, or when the system boots.
Passwords are still considered a bit more safe then a fingerprint reader
(as far as I know).
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4
nt side, which if correctly
authentificated will issue public-key auth with the server, or sort of..
:) Not really BioAPI auth, but it enables the user to do remote logins
by putting the finger on the reader..
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0
):
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_enable_the_fingerprint_reader
SSH can do pam authentication.
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It is dangerous to be right whe
wever, this just happens to be the implementation
(probably pthread_sigmask is a wrapper to sigprocmask).
This might not be the case on other OS, so for portability I'll stick to
the pthread_sigmask in threads, and sigprocmask in single threaded apps.
Thanks,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID
also with the help of:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sigprocmask.html
Thank you very much! (all involved)
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It
I would recommend you also visit
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_04.html
I've read it, thanks. I added it to my bookmarks.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --key
g)
And also, is there a way for delegating one special thread to handle
all the external signals? (on BSD)
Thanks for the time guys.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:42:11 -0500
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 February 2006 06:42, Anton Barsukov wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:58:33 -0500
> >
> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 28 January 20
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:58:33 -0500
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 28 January 2006 04:23, Anton Barsukov wrote:
> > Hi everybody
> >
> > I install ports/benchmarks/forkbomb,
> > when i run '%forkbomb -f', kernel panic.
> >
>
Hi everybody
I install ports/benchmarks/forkbomb,
when i run '%forkbomb -f', kernel panic.
instruction pointer = pmap_qremove(sva=4290785280, count=0) at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c:896
FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE(GENERIC) i386
machine( MB -- P4P800SE,
CPU -- P4 3GHz,
RAM -- 2x51
I told you it's an empty body, but this is probably why you opened it.
Happy new year FreeBSD hackers, and thank you all for your work and efforts.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu -
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
I used it now, and with a small patch it shows exactly what I need (seq,
ack, timestamp, cwnd and ssthresh). I just added my knob to trpt.c .
I also modified the iptime() function to provide microsecond resolution
instead of miliseconds, because most of the packets
Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Vlad GALU wrote:
On 12/1/05, Alin-Adrian Anton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Hackers,
I would like to monitor the changes of cwnd and sstresh
values during
TCP traffic, in order to plot graphs and interpret congestion.
So
erely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire
___
freebsd-hackers@free
Eric Anderson wrote:
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
I don't know if the mbox format can handle this, and I know
Maildir cannot handle this on UFS2 standard install, no matter of
soft-updates. (because it exhaustes the free nodes) So I currently
have no solution for this stuff.
I&
thing else but
readonly.
So any suggestion would really help a lot. Thank's in advance.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It is dangerous
=1 ttl=233 time=106.194 ms
Seems not to be working :(
Yours,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It is dangerous to be right when the gove
time=96.220 ms
If anyone could help me a bit, I'd be really thankfull.
Thanks for the time.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x183087BA
"It is dangerous to be right when
Hi list!
We have device:
#dmesg|grep KONICA
ulpt0: KONICA MINOLTA KONICA MINOLTA Di1611 TWAIN Device, rev 1.10/1.00,
addr 2, iclass 255/255
http://www.minolta.pl/products/business/kop_druk_cz-b/di1611_2011/-
picture.
It works fine like printer server connected to FreeBSD 5.4 box, but als
-audit
Dougb at some point promised to get back with his comments, but it never
happened. :-(
\Anton.
--
The moronity of the universe is a monotonically increasing function. --
Jarkko Hietaniemi
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing lis
awsock bpf combination instead of
bpf (or raw socket) only?
Depends on what best fits your development circumstances.
The paper I co-authored uses bpf for reading, and socket for writing.
Thx in advance,
dave
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 6
/write ethernet packets too, for example, while
raw_sockets cannot.
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
Never ask a man what OS he uses. If it's a BSD, he'll tell you.
If it's not
Hello,
my question is how a ioctl is called when i use int ioctl(fd ) from
userland. i think first, a trap is generated through the handler in
exeption.S, that calls the routine for system-calls, and that calls via the
syscall-vector-table the function sys_ioctl (? i think). by the way, where
an enormous number of factors, where most are incontrolable.
So just try keeping time in long format, for seconds. See if it still fails.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
N
provide better accuracy then just measuring time.
Using it in a cycle of measurements would provide relevant output, and
perhaps more accurate then PERFMON (because of direct CPU access).
clock_gettime also provides nanoseconds resolution, as pointed out.
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E
Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
For this snippet (which deals with a B+tree) i got results of the form
0.3445866564 microseconds, which means 344.5867 miliseconds.. etc..
You mixed the units up
1 second is 1 000 ms which is 1 000 000 µs which is 1 000 000 000 ns.
Yes I
time
resolution, which is, as far as i know, in microseconds.
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
Never ask a man what OS he uses. If it's FreeBSD, he'll tell you.
eady desynced and I receive no output. The connection times out in 5
minutes.
I hope I didn't use a way too obfuscated English.
PS: I personally suspect a hardware failure, probably an ethernet card,
and he is going to check this out tomorrow.
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Spintech Systems
G
Claudiu wrote:
> I have also checked the SMART state of the driver with smartctl, it
looks like this: [...]
Same happens with my atapi cdrom from time to time. Could be messed-up IDE
channel.
But anyway, good time for a backup. Did you try a fsck -y..
Yours,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Spint
ibe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Spintech Systems
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lis
list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Try the drivers from www.opensound.com and see if it can get it working. If
they can, then probably the card is also modified too.
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
G
Probably his point was no-name hardware with small buffers may add to the
latency.
Thank you all so much!
Best Wishes,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
__
----- Original Message -
From: "Anton Alin-Adrian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Different ports? Why would be using different ports different? They (users)
need to go out to irc with a different IP each time they connect. In order
to do that, psybnc needs to use that specific IP when con
connecting outside to
the IRC server. I don't see how different ports will change this situation.
Nambased vhosts work for web, I guess, but not for IRC.
Let one correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks for all the replies. 240 IPs is far enough.
- Original Message -
From: "Anton Alin-Adria
sincerely,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Andrew Beals wrote:
Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD
distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does
everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable?
Is there any for IMAP?
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID
Yes, thank's everybody.
Unfortunately I thought I blocked this (old)mail message into the MTA's
queue, however, it seems it passed out today, by my mistake.
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F
od to ask: am I doing
something wrong, or is there something else wrong?
Any suggestion is gratefully appreciated.
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg
Craig Booth wrote:
Anton, thank you for taking time to help. I have answered your questions
within your text at the bottom of this email as best as I know how to as a
raw BSD Unix user.
I defentaley appologise for not answering for such a long time, my
attention was caught in the anti-spam war
24? That's
another story...) to 20 or 24 bytes bytes just to make its life
easier. Therefore it's giving you four "extra" bytes and the nul can
clobber them without causing you to notice the bug.
-Dan
Yes. Thanks ;).
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Anton Alin-Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-24 21:27 +0300]:
tmp = (char *) malloc(strlen(s)); // line 68
Hmm, you need strlen(s)+1 bytes to store the string -- don't forget
the trailing null byte.
Nicolas
And let there be light... DANG.. well it almost
roperly, it is not
beautified and optimized (yet).
PS: another possibility is that I have a 1 byte overflow inside the string
pointed to by *s, even before calling the adjust_spaces(char *s) function;
but I simply cannot focus anymore,so please help me a bit.
Thanks for your time.
Sincerely Yours,
loaded modules?
I assume the card is working neat on XP. Have you tried it after
rebooting freebsd without actually going into XP? XP may set up some
BIOS parameters which FreeBSD doesn't like?
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 003
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:25:08PM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
I am killing myself trying to compile http://www.vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/
driver on 5.2.1-RELEASE.
Try the atuwi from my perforce tree.
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
#x27;t know why it is still not compiling
(and if those 2 incompatibilities are related or not).
If anyone is kind enough to share me a hand of help, it is heavely
appreciated.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D3
#x27;t know why it is still not compiling
(and if those 2 incompatibilities are related or not).
If anyone is kind enough to share me a hand of help, it is heavely
appreciated.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D3
7;\r') { state = 4; continue; }
state = 0;
break;
case 4: /* + \r */
if (ch == '\n') { state = 1; break; }
if (ch != '\r') { put("\r"); state = 0; }
}
put(&ch);
}
}
One can see that pos is later used as an index for memory loc
regarding text line limitations.
+* Developed by Alin-Adrian Anton
([EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED])
+*
+* You may remove this banner if it annoys you. This patch is
public domain, for the
+* benefit of the community.
+*
+* It also fixes an integer overflow in the blast
Dinesh Nair wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch.
Please double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to
freebsd-security please.
320c320
< ++pos;
---
if (pos>9) ++pos;
--- qmail-smtpd.c Mon Jun 15 13:53:16 1998
+++ qmail-smtpd-patched.c Mon Jan 19 15:22:23 2004
@@ -316,8 +316,8 @@
if (flagmaybex) if (pos == 7) ++*hops;
if (pos < 2) if (ch != "\r\n"[pos]) flagmaybey = 0;
if (flagmaybey) if (pos == 1) flaginheader = 0;
+ ++
This is the patch I am currently using, for qmail-smtpd.c . I don't dare
to touch RFC because I did not carefully read qmail sources and I am not
aware of details/impact.
I think this patch is good enough to simply remove the vulnerability.
I now looked more thoroughly at the code and ask other
Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch.
Please double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to
freebsd-security please.
Regards,
Alin
Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch.
Please double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to
freebsd-security please.
Regards,
Alin.
320c320
< ++
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch. Please
double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to freebsd-security please.
Regards,
Alin.
320c320
< ++pos;
---
> if (pos>9) ++pos;
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
New Year's
Eve on top of the mountains, without functional gprs/cda. (at least i'll
be on the edge :D)
Best wishes, friends !
Yours sincerely,
Alin-Adrian Anton.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Hi,
those who followed might have noticed I was shopping for a notebook to
replace some of my desktop system. To make it short, the notebook
vendors all pissed me off so good that I'm not going to get a notebook
(details on request) so I am going for other options.
Here is
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Andy Hilker wrote:
Hi,
i try porting a little utility from linux to freebsd.
Maybe someone could give me a hint, what i am doing wrong.
-- snip --
/* Note: not portable */
// if ((s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_PACKET, SOCK_PACKET)) < 0) {
// ??? ported
if ((s = socket(AF_INET,SOCK_RAW,IPP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have a dedicated server the one was up for more than 84 days but this
Friday 19, suddenly the server was rebooted.
this is the output of the "last" command
# last | grep reboot
reboot ~ vie 19 sep 13:55
I already have check the
http://petition.eurolinux.org/ sign the petition against the new patents law.
find more about this law at http://swpat.ffii.org/ and mirror their website (for load
purposes).
close your website as did www.gimp.org and protest with banners, and in any other way.
God bless the virus industry.
Yo
Wes Peters wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2003 08:01 pm, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Yes, it works now, with these includes:
---
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
---
Believe
Toni Andjelkovic wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09 2003 (12:45:14 +0300), Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Usually? What does usually mean? I know I can use bpf. But is there
another way to look at incoming TCP packet ? What I did is I sent a TCP
SYN packet and the server answers with a TCP SYN_ACK packet. How
Kip Macy wrote:
Usually if your looking at raw packets you want to use BPF.
-Kip
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Hey folks,
I wrote my piece of code to play with, and it uses raw sockets to send
TCP packets. It sends packets okay, everything tested with a sniffer
Hey folks,
I wrote my piece of code to play with, and it uses raw sockets to send
TCP packets. It sends packets okay, everything tested with a sniffer,
everything is really really fine, but it seems I cannot recvfrom
anything. I mean, it just keeps waiting and doesn't see the reply the
server
Harti Brandt wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
AA>Harti Brandt wrote:
AA>
AA>>On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
AA>>
AA>>AA>>>In file included from raw.c:7:
AA>>AA>>>/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:156: syntax error before
Harti Brandt wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
AA>>>In file included from raw.c:7:
AA>>>/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:156: syntax error before `n_long'
AA>>>/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:159: syntax error before `n_long'
You may want to include
Tom Servo wrote:
Off the top of my head this appears to be an include sequencing/circular
include problem. Check the type that 'n_long' is being defined as and make
sure that the proper includes that define the type are defined before the
variable is defined and make sure that it is not getting r
Hey folks,
I am playing with raw sockets on a FreeBSD 4.8 STABLE. This is the
include section from my file:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
When i try to compile the code, this is what I get:
%cc -o raw raw.c
In file included from raw.c:7
Hi guys,
As sendmail showed to be so vulnerable in the past, and even in the
recent past, I was wondering to propose removing it from the default
install on freebsd. Currently, sendmail comes with the system sources,
and runs as root. I think this is bad, and it could be replaced with
qmail, f
ormed from HDD device, but it is untrue.
Maybe I should use different boot blocks? Is it possible to boot FreeBSD
form ZIP device (seen by BIOS as ZIP, not HDD or FDD)? I know that we have
different boot block to boot from CD (/boot/cdboot) and maybe we should have
something like /boot/zipboot?
A
eeBSD
from usb flash?
Yours,
Anton L. Vinokurov, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NeTAMS Development Team
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
comes from Cisco ATA186 voice gateway in several minutes
after call starts. Same time, OpenBSD 3.2 with a similar if_kue.c driver
works fine at least under one day voice traffic load. I tried original
driver and altq modifed with no success.
Could someone suggest me a way to fix my problem?
Anton L
Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:55:46PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
>
> > 4.6-RC (which I am assuming is "release candidate") still doesn't
> > walk the entire PCI bus and find all devices for a Dell Poweredge 4600.
> >
The issue here is that there are nameservers out there which, with
the prior release of freebsd, worked fine with sendmail.
An incompatible version of sendmail is about to be foisted on an
unsuspecting public.
I don't care particularly one way or the other, as I now know
what the problem is, and
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> > So, in violation of the networking "be liberal in what you accept and
> > conservative in what you produce", sendmail in it&
the world, syslog warning
entries might be a less unfriendly way to alert the unwashed masses
of the egregious violations of "correctness".
Cheers,
Damon.
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:15:46PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permez
Since upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6-*, I have had problems exchanging
email with a correspondent at "austinenergy.com". It shows up as:
% echo hi | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
austinenergy.com: Name server timeout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Transient parse error -- message queued for
f
4.6-RC (which I am assuming is "release candidate") still doesn't
walk the entire PCI bus and find all devices for a Dell Poweredge 4600.
Below, interested parties will be able to peruse the `boot -v' results,
followed by `scanpci -v1'.
I have a single Qlogic F/C card plugged into one of the PCI
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:45:59PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> Ian Noname wrote:
>
> | > The general rule is "including includes from includes is bad".
> |
> | Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
> | differing opinions exist.
>
> There's no shortage of opinions.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 01:24:20PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 12:47] wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:39:26PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > getrusage(2)
> > That's not quite it - it does not provid
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
