Maximum data size

Hi all, I am trying to allow a program to use more than 512MB of memory (specifically a little over 1GB), but I can't seem to be able to. I tried with ulimit -d 2097152, but when I check back again (immediately after setting it), it reads data seg size (kbytes, -d) 524288 (again).

Re: Maximum data size

Hey, thanks a lot!! that was it - Daniel - Original Message From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Daniel Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 11:11:29 AM Subject: Re: Maximum data size Daniel Valencia wrote: Hi all, I am trying to allow a program

Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects

Shouldn't it be actually enabled by default?... I think a user should be able to get the insecure behaviour _only_ if he wants to... - Daniel - Original Message From: Joerg Pernfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sent:

Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects

Actually, I would like to support this motion... Thinking over the possible behaviours of -P is to sit in a room saying to delete or not to delete... If you think it over from a higher perspective, The UNIX Way (TM) is to have individual commands for specific tasks and to extract tasks from

Re: About amd64 dualcore problems with two SATA disks and nforce4

disk in my system... If there is anything I can do to help fix that problem (like testing and such), please let me know... - Daniel --- Daniel Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Well... Hopeful with your mailings, I updated the kernel (cvsup) and rebuilt it... the problem's still

Re: About amd64 dualcore problems with two SATA disks and nforce4

Hi, Well... Hopeful with your mailings, I updated the kernel (cvsup) and rebuilt it... the problem's still there... detects one SATA disk (ad4) and crashes before acknowledging the second (ad6)... - Daniel S�ren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Valencia wrote: Hi, So, what's

About amd64 dualcore problems with two SATA disks and nforce4

Hello, I started a short thread a few weeks ago, pointing out a problem with my dualcore athlon64, when detecting the second SATA disk (/dev/ad6)... my chipset is an nForce4... The problem was narrowed down to a few commits performed at a particular date and time. My questions are: is it

Re: About amd64 dualcore problems with two SATA disks and nforce4

Hi, So, what's your last src/ cvsup date/time? is your machine dualcore? if so, are you building using the SMP option? mine breaks when in SMP mode... in GENERIC it works, just it doesn't detect the second SATA disk. - Daniel S�ren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Valencia wrote

Re: Fwd: Re: Problems with SMP in amd64

John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2006 02:54, Daniel Valencia wrote: OK... it's Jan. 25th, at 8:14am. there are a bunch of commits at 8:14:45 that relate to the ata drivers, and a couple at second 46 and 47... but that's it. Interesting. Those changes are just

Re: Fwd: Re: Problems with SMP in amd64

I've narrowed it down to Jan. 25th, 7:30am - 8:15am I'll try to narrow it down a little further Thanks, - Daniel --- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 06 February 2006 23:50, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:50:35PM -0800, Daniel Valencia wrote

Re: Fwd: Re: Problems with SMP in amd64

OK... it's Jan. 25th, at 8:14am. there are a bunch of commits at 8:14:45 that relate to the ata drivers, and a couple at second 46 and 47... but that's it. Thanks, - Daniel Daniel Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've narrowed it down to Jan. 25th, 7:30am - 8:15am I'll try to narrow

Fwd: Re: Problems with SMP in amd64

Note: forwarded message attached. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---BeginMessage--- --- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 04 February 2006 02:39, Daniel

Problems with SMP in amd64

Hello... I've been trying to update my system in the STABLE branch, and every time I install the new kernel, built using SMP, the system won't boot... as I don't know where the problem could be and it doesn't seem to have been fixed, I thought it a good idea to let you guys know... The

Re: Problems with SMP in amd64

I just noticed something... it actually boots well using SMP on 6.0-RELEASE... the problem is when using the last STABLE src Thanks, - Daniel Daniel Valencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello... I've been trying to update my system in the STABLE branch, and every time I install

strange behaviour with pthread_cond_wait()

Hello, everybody... I have this multithreaded program, and there are these two threads that work together with a queue. The backend receive thread reads packets and pushes them into the queue, while the frontend thread pops them off the queue to hand them to the caller. This is an

Re: strange behaviour with pthread_cond_wait()

Hello I just had to lock the mutex before waiting on the condition... my problem is solved now. Thank you very much for the tip. Daniel __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com