CHN_LOCK()

I keep on getting debug messages like this, both at startup and right before any sound plays: Jun 14 23:44:38 teqnix kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1327: could sleep with pcm0:play:0 locked from /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/dsp.c:713 heyeh, Jun 14 23:44:38 teqnix kernel:

jail.c patch

Hello, I've been reading this thread. I made the augustments to the patch so that it first checks if it is an IP address, if it is not, it then tries to see if it is a hostname. If neither are true it exits with an error. Hope this is what you're looking for, Evan --- jail.c Mon Jul 30

jail.c patch (fixed)

Hey guys. heh. Sorry about that, I just fixed it and it all works fine. :-) Exams are making my brain fry. Here is the revised patch. Thanks, - Evan --- jail.c Mon Jul 30 06:19:54 2001 +++ jail.modMon Dec 10 14:00:57 2001 @@ -10,9 +10,8 @@ * */ -#include stdio.h +#include

jail patch

Hello, I wrote this a while ago, but, if anyone is interested, please take a look: this module implements a system call that takes a u_int_32t. This system call, named killjail, kills all processes which belong to the jail which uses that particular IP address. I included it in a tar with a

Re: Changing syscalls numbers

Did you type make init_sysent.c, after editing syscalls.master? - Evan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

IMPORTANT!! Re: panic on mount

Hello, Just to clarify things for everyone who may be having this probme: there is a panic on bootup with current, within the witness* code. You can avoid this by commenting out WITNESS in your kernel configuration and recompiling. It worked for me.. Hope this helps someone. Thanks, Evan John

panic on mount

Hello, After compiling a new kernel, installing it, when my laptop tries to mount its drive, it panics with this message: panic: lock (sleep mutex) vnode interlock not locked @ ../../../kern/vfs_default.c:460 which is: if (ap-a_flags LK_INTERLOCK)

interesting -current project

Hello, Since the relaes for 5.0 was extended another year, an interesting feature I'd like to see go in to the kernel is hooks. So users can add extra security checks.. etc. There's a project in its beginnings right now, www.freesoftware.fsf.org/jailuser/ Think anyone could join the prfw mailing

sysent in fork()

Hey, I have a question about sysent. If a modification to a processes p-p_sysent and associated substructures are made, are the changes propagated through fork to children? Thanks, Evan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the

mutex locking pgrp

/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=29423 -- --- Evan Sarmiento | www.open-root.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.sekt7.org/~ems/ --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: kern/29423: [PATCH] kernel security hooks implementation

optional ktr kern/kern_ktrace.cstandard -- --- Evan Sarmiento | www.open-root.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.sekt7.org/~ems/ --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body

Re: messed up /etc/rc.conf

] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message -- --- Evan Sarmiento | www.open-root.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.sekt7.org/~ems/ --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers

hooks

Hello, I need each system call to check with a master table of restrictions before executing a function. Is there a way to do this without copying and pasting a bit of code that does this checking into every system call? Thanks, -- --- Evan Sarmiento

passing function ptrs to syscalls

-- --- Evan Sarmiento | www.open-root.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.sekt7.org/~ems/ --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

pfind() question

information in this proc structure? Thanks a lot, Evan Sarmiento To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

LIST_NEXT()

on queue and looked at the proc structure. Here's the code: int prfw_setflags(p, uap) struct proc *p; struct prfw_setflags_args *uap; { ... if (uap-id) { while (uap-id != p-p_pid) LIST_NEXT(p, p_list); } ... } Thanks a lot. Evan Sarmiento To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

No Subject

Subject: jailuser project --text follows this line-- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I would like your input on a project I am currently working on called Jailuser. Jail, which is similar, chroots an enviornment and sets restrictions on processes forked within. However,