On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed Sep 15 10, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
[...]
8. Alexander Motin has an updated CAM version of the ATA system which
will eventually replace the existing one. In -CURRENT,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a directory that must not exist on logout and rm -rf is not
sufficent to do it because the contents need to be processed by our
version control system. The real life scenario is our version
control system
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
I am trying to get the log of all system calls that skype makes with truss
-f /usr/local/share/skype/skype
For some reason the resulting log only has the leading process calls and
nothing from it's 8 childs.
Truss doesn't show any
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:29 -0700, N.J. Mann wrote:
In message 1283271393.3665.13.ca...@home-yahoo,
Sean Bruno (sean...@yahoo-inc.com) wrote:
An issue in testing came up where we were trying to mount NFS
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 30/08/2010 00:13 do...@freebsd.org said the following:
On 08/29/2010 09:33 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
Can you run firefox from xterm and check for any errors that might be
generated?
Cheers,
--
Glen Barber
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
removing ~/.mozilla works fine. I think that problem's related to
add-on Xmarks I've been installer or to Restore session
functionality
It would have been interesting to capture what `froze' the machine, in
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
just discovered this issue while going through some linux mailinglists:
otaku% dd if=/dev/urandom of=testfile bs=1 count=42
42+0 records in
42+0 records out
42 bytes transferred in 0.000393 secs (106894 bytes/sec)
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/10 10:18 AM, Davide Italiano wrote:
Hi.
I'm running 8.1 on my Sony Vaio laptop, with dwm as window manager on
lastest Xorg on
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Davide Italiano
davide.itali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Glen Barber
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:07 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 20, 2010 10:14:46 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi,
Currently the code in identcpu.c does a check for a specific cpu
value extension. This is set to 0x8004 (even though the
corresponding code below
Hi,
Currently the code in identcpu.c does a check for a specific cpu
value extension. This is set to 0x8004 (even though the
corresponding code below iterates through 0x8002:0x8005):
/* Check for extended CPUID information and a processor name. */
if (cpu_exthigh =
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the following modules:
/* first.c */
static int *test;
int
test_function(void)
{
return *test;
}
static int
first_modevent(struct module *m, int what, void *arg)
{
int err = 0;
switch
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Atom Smasher a...@smasher.org wrote:
hardware:
MACH: x86_64 (LENOVO, 4313CTO, ThinkPad T510)
CPU: x86_64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz)
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0 (amd64)
in /etc/make.conf i tried setting CPUTYPE=core but as soon as i start
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Monday, August 16, 2010 7:23:54 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:33:38 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
One thing that's puzzling me
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:19 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:33:38 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
One thing that's puzzling me about the ppc(4) driver's ISA
routines is that it only checks to see whether or not the device has
an IO error:
Your patch would
One thing that's puzzling me about the ppc(4) driver's ISA
routines is that it only checks to see whether or not the device has
an IO error:
(from sys/dev/ppc/ppc_isa.c)
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@
parent = device_get_parent(dev);
error = ISA_PNP_PROBE(parent, dev, lpc_ids);
mount(2) says it should fail with EINVAL if the magic block is wrong:
[EINVAL] The super block for the file system had a bad magic
number or an out of range block size.
This doesn't appear to be the case with a nmount layer though :/.
I didn't find
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Paul Thornton p...@prt.org wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
* Paul Thornton p...@prt.org wrote:
I'm using 8.0-RELEASE with uftdi and ucom driving the serial port.
Somewhat unrelated question: have you ever tried running the this code
on 7.x? If so, did it work?
2010/8/9 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org writes:
Why would someone express a tunable in a memory address (not being
sarcastic... I just don't see why it makes sense right now, but if
there's a valid reason I'm more than happy to be educated :)..)?
A few
2010/8/7 Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Perhaps. I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in
the list archives (other than me announcing
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, M. Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
In message: 20100808130624.gb40...@sandvine.com
Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org writes:
: On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
:
: 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no:
: Garrett
Hi Hackers,
Poking around the sound(4) drivers, I looked into converting one
of the TUNABLE_INTs to an unsigned tunable for testing purposes. I
looked in kernel.h and I saw the following comment:
/*
* int
* please avoid using for new tunables!
*/
I found the commit where it was made
2010/8/7 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org writes:
I found the commit where it was made (by des@ -- cvs revision
1.120), but unfortunately I lack the context as to why that suggestion
is made; the commit isn't very explicit as to why integers tunables
2010/8/7 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org writes:
Ok, but still - if the underlying value really is declared as int,
doesn't it make perfect sense to have something like TUNABLE_INT for it?
Perhaps. I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Samuel Martín Moro faus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
...
So, is it possible to / how could I make ${dev}c appear on 8.1, like it was
in previous releases?
It's a geom(4) change. Try ${dev} instead of ${dev}c (this should work
on all releases, but I could be wrong).
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I ran into an oddity with the POSIX spec that seems a bit unrealistic:
[EINVAL]
The rqtp argument specified a nanosecond value less than zero or
greater than or equal to 1000 million.
Seems like
Hi Hackers,
I ran into an oddity with the POSIX spec that seems a bit unrealistic:
[EINVAL]
The rqtp argument specified a nanosecond value less than zero or
greater than or equal to 1000 million.
Seems like it should also apply for seconds 0. We current
silently pass this argument
Hi,
Running the following noted test [1], I always run into issues on
the 29th iteration and EAGAIN:
$ conformance/behavior/timers/1-1.run-test
timer_create() did not return success for iteration 29: Resource
temporarily unavailable
$ conformance/behavior/timers/1-1.run-test
timer_create()
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Rui Paulo rpa...@lavabit.com wrote:
On 24 Jul 2010, at 14:53, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I've make small observations of Intel TurboBoost technology under
FreeBSD. This technology allows Intel Core i5/i7 CPUs to rise frequency
of some cores if other cores
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
...
This seems wrong for directories. It should say ... unless the file
is 'executable'. 'executable' means searchable for directories, and
the above shouldn't apply
Hi Hackers,
I ran into an issue last night where apparently several apps make
faulty assumptions w.r.t. whether or not access(2) returns functional
data when running as a superuser.
POSIX says:
In early proposals, some inadequacies in the access() function led
to the creation of an
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:46:25PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
sighold(3) doesn't determine whether or not the signal added is
valid today (and sigprocmask doesn't verify that either). This fixes
that.
Thanks
sigrelse has the same problem as (*sigset) as far as not catching
sigaddset(3) errors is concerned.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Index: compat-43/sigcompat.c
===
--- compat-43/sigcompat.c (revision 210226)
+++ compat-43/sigcompat.c
CCing hack...@.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Subject: [PATCH] Catch errors with sigaddset(3) in sigaddset (*sigset)
To: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
None of the sigprocmask(2) code actually checks
CCing hack...@.
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
The following patch resolves a missing requirement that's defined
by POSIX 2001.3 for sigismember(3) (the tort follows more of what's
stated in the POSIX spec [1]).
Index: libc/gen/sigsetops.3
The following patch fixes the case where the value for sigmask
specified is invalid (to match the requirements stated in the manpage
and POSIX), and also converts the parameter name -- mask -- to match
the manpage.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Index: compat-43/sigcompat.c
Looks like kib@ checked in a version with the sigdelset fixes for
xsi_sigpause(3). This goes one step further by changing the prototype
to follow the declaration in the manpage.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Index: compat-43/sigcompat.c
===
sighold(3) doesn't determine whether or not the signal added is
valid today (and sigprocmask doesn't verify that either). This fixes
that.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Index: sigcompat.c
===
--- sigcompat.c (revision 210226)
+++ sigcompat.c
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 6:34 AM, joris dedieu joris.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch add a -t switch to install(3). This is a small feature for
lazy sysadmins.
before :
touch /usr/home/foo/.history /usr/home/foo/.bash_history
chown foo /usr/home/foo/.history /usr/home/foo/.bash_history
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 07/09/10 08:11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
-# UNAUTHORISED CHANGES WILL BE UNCONDITIONALLY REVERTED!
+# UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES WILL BE UNCONDITIONALLY REVERTED!
Couple of comments. The above is not a typo, that's the British
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:35 PM, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
So I'm taking it that the only change of benefit is the attached patch.
While you are there, you might also:
line 150: s/supercede/supersede/
line 764: s/dependancies/dependencies/
line 2982: s/everthing/everything/
line
Spotted this really minor item that I figured could be converted over
to _SIG_VALID in ddb:
Index: ddb/db_command.c
===
--- ddb/db_command.c(revision 206173)
+++ ddb/db_command.c(working copy)
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@
if
Found another item that could be converted over to _SIG_VALID in
libthr's thr_sig.c this time.
Thanks,
-Garrett
Index: lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c
===
--- lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c (revision 206173)
+++
This is a change I made locally that I figured would be helpful because it:
a. Fixes typos.
b. Improves branch flow in a few spots.
c. Doesn't assume that all strings that come back from pkg_install
are empty (this is what's assumed today).
Thanks,
-Garrett
---
So, long story short... I've basically ported the open posix testsuite
to FreeBSD, and one of the tests tests out sigpause. Unfortunately the
sucker hangs on my dev box at home.
I've written a short testcase that demonstrates this. It prints out:
$ ~/test_sigpause
0
And proceeds to be
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:39:39PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, long story short... I've basically ported the open posix testsuite
to FreeBSD, and one of the tests tests out sigpause. Unfortunately the
sucker hangs
2010/7/11 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:30:01PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:39:39PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
So, long story short... I've basically
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/11 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:30:01PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:39
2010/7/11 Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:59:05 -0700
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
+ if (!_SIG_VALID(how))
+ return (-EINVAL);
-EINVAL? Smells too much of Linux, try returning EINVAL instead.
Wow, I'm batting 1,000 today. Please
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/11 Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:59:05 -0700
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
+ if (!_SIG_VALID(how))
+ return (-EINVAL);
-EINVAL? Smells too much
(Let's try this again with the right email address)
Something simple that I noticed a while back when I was reviewing
the Makefile.inc1 code. The SUBDIR_OVERRIDE code is executed after the
conditional feature checks, which sets the value of SUBDIRS to the
user defined value. So instead of
Hi hackers,
There are a series of patches that I'd like to get reviewed before
jumping onto another project that would clean up and move pkg_install
forward. portmgr has been kind of busy lately (mostly flz), so I don't
think that these have been reviewed by him:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Matthew Fleming mdf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the following Makefile for a shared library at $work:
ISI_TOP= ../..
LIB= isi_date
SHLIB_MAJOR= 1
SHLIB_MINOR= 0
SRCS= date.c date_parser.new.c lex.yy.c
INCS= date.h
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Philip Herron redbr...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
On 2 July 2010 23:31, Matthew Fleming mdf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Philip Herron redbr...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
Although maybe not helpful but have you considered using
automake/libtool instead
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
Which patch ? icebp generates the SIGTRAP on latest 8-stable, verified
by the following trivival assembler program:
.text
.globl main
main:
.byte 0xf1
xorl %edi,%edi
call
Hi guys,
I currently set:
.POSIX=
In a Makefile thinking that it would enable only POSIX
functionality, and was fidgeting around with the Makefile trying to
get it to work. In short, I used secondary expansion, it worked, then
compared the output from gmake and it failed (because they
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
Which patch ? icebp generates the SIGTRAP on latest 8-stable, verified
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Uffe Jakobsen u...@uffe.org wrote:
Garrett writes:
Also, is there perhaps a sideeffect dealing with the size of a char on
FreeBSD vs Linux?
That's a pretty badass way to load assembler instructions on the stack
:).
I may be totally wrong here - but could
2010/6/30 Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:42:47 -0700
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Garrett Cooper
yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30
Hi Hackers,
I realize this is a trivial patch, but it's a minor item that I
found kind of fascinating (and not thoroughly documented elsewhere
because many examples are booting mfsroots instead of directly booting
off nfs roots), but I'm proposing that pxeboot default to
vfs.root.mountfrom=nfs
The build for r209530 failed with a clean workspace and a clean
/usr/obj/scratch. I was building with a memory-disk backed /usr/obj.
Here's the error:
=== usr.bin/ar (depend)
lex -t /scratch/freebsd/current/usr.bin/ar/acplex.l acplex.c
yacc -d /scratch/freebsd/current/usr.bin/ar/acpyacc.y
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
The build for r209530 failed with a clean workspace and a clean
/usr/obj/scratch. I was building with a memory-disk backed /usr/obj.
Here's the error:
=== usr.bin/ar (depend)
lex -t /scratch/freebsd/current/usr.bin
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've created a patch that increases the performance of mtree. This is of
particular use during a port install. In an extreme case I have experienced a
~20% increase [1].
For a full discussion see PR
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/21/10 02:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
For whatever reason my source tree wasn't prebuilt, so I reran
buildkernel and everything was fine once again.
So, do the tests pass now? :)
Not 100%, but that might be a problem
Err... I ran an mqueue test and it popped up with ENOSYS. Which
makes me wonder, are POSIX mqueues implemented 100% on FreeBSD? I
looked into sys/kern/uip_mqueue.c and it _appears_ functional, but I
could be misreading the code. Another test written which tests mqueue
appears to be broken as
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stathis Kamperis ekamp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/21 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com:
Err... I ran an mqueue test and it popped up with ENOSYS. Which
makes me wonder, are POSIX mqueues implemented 100% on FreeBSD? I
looked into sys/kern/uip_mqueue.c
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 21 June 2010 10:11, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stathis Kamperis ekamp...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/21 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com:
Err... I ran an mqueue test
I might be completely missing the boat as to what needs to be done
here, but the current code in Makefile.inc1, and lib/Makefile appears
very race condition prone:
From Makefile.inc1:
_prebuild_libs= ${_kerberos5_lib_libasn1} ${_kerberos5_lib_libheimntlm} \
On Jun 9, 2010, at 6:25 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:13:56AM -0400, jhell wrote:
On 06/09/2010 04:14, Ilya Bakulin wrote:
Hi hackers!
While discussing my project's implementation details with my mentor,
Alexander Leidinger, we've found that one of the ideas needs
2010/5/29 C. Bergström cbergst...@pathscale.com:
PathScale is slowly open sourcing and porting some of our core software
technology and thought the BSD community might be interested in PathDB.
Months ago we gave a few FBSD developers private access to the source, but
never received any
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:53 PM, none none rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
Still no answer?
Hey, there is also a thread:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=14059
Hate to say but you're doing something unsupported, so unless you walk
through the process by yourself to figure out where
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/2010 10:01, jhell wrote:
On 05/24/2010 18:26, Sean Bruno wrote:
Find attached a patch against -CURRENT.
This update exposes a counter that indicates the number of times
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/2010 10:01, jhell wrote:
On 05/24/2010 18:26, Sean Bruno wrote:
Find attached a patch against
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am not sure the right forum to ask this question - is there any effort done
to find portable code between different OSes, particularly freebsd and linux?
Specifically, the networking layer could be
On May 13, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:44:58PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Problem with /dev/null /dev/zero inside a chroot:
I wanted to build a release from inside a chroot
What sort of null zero should be in chroot ?
man mknod ... deprecated
Hi Hackers,
Ignoring the compiler warning (yes, I know...), why is the offset for
the argv[0] (program name) in the following program off by one? It doesn't make
sense why the fstat would work, but the printf would fail (and in fact segfault
if I remove the 1 argc guard statement and
On May 12, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2010 17:30:48 -0400
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hackers,
Ignoring the compiler warning (yes, I know...), why is the offset for
the argv[0] (program name) in the following program off by one? It doesn't
2010/5/6 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
2010/5/7 Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com:
2010/5/5 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Is there a way to convert a (char *) pointer (or in general any
pointer) to a vm_offset_t type?
Be wary that char
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Gunnar Hinriksson tomt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Im having a little problem using ptrace on my system.
If I use ptrace to attach to another process the child process
segfaults once I detach.
For example using this simple program.
#include stdio.h
#include
2010/4/25 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 04/25/10 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Eitan Adler eitanadlerl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Same as before - if all is good I'll send a PR
#!/bin/sh
#
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/periodic/daily/210.backup-aliases,v 1.6.36.1.2.1
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Hocking
stephen.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Am noticing the following when attempting to build a kernel:
[r...@blurfl /usr/src]# make buildkernel
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Stephen Hocking
stephen.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM, M. Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
In message: g2i7d6fde3d1004261613h44c1631fj3b52fbb9bf4f7...@mail.gmail.com
Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com writes:
: On Mon, Apr
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Eitan Adler eitanadlerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Same as before - if all is good I'll send a PR
#!/bin/sh
#
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/periodic/daily/210.backup-aliases,v 1.6.36.1.2.1
2009/10/25 01:10:29 kensmith Exp $
#
# If there is a global system configuration
Hi hackers,
I realize that this isn't 100% userland code, so the checks should
be minimalized, but when looking at the ioctl(2) syscall code (at
least I think it is... there's another dupe hanging around in
sys/dev/hptmv/ioctl.c), I had some questions related to the error
handling not being
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Fleming
matthew.flem...@isilon.com wrote:
Hi hackers,
I realize that this isn't 100% userland code, so the checks should
be minimalized, but when looking at the ioctl(2) syscall code (at
least I think it is... there's another dupe hanging around in
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Xin LI delp...@delphij.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010/04/22 17:45, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Fleming
matthew.flem...@isilon.com wrote:
Hi hackers,
I realize that this isn't 100
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 18/04/2010 13:21 Garrett Cooper said the following:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 18/04/2010 06:11 Yoshihiro Ota said the following:
If you want to make a bootable FreeBSD CD
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 18/04/2010 06:11 Yoshihiro Ota said the following:
If you want to make a bootable FreeBSD CD, take a look at
freesbie in ports. That's what the software does.
I that doesn't satisfy you, you can start look into
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Alexander Leidinger writes:
In the OSS world people to not get included (getting invited),
they more attach themself to something (seeing a warm welcome
when providing help).
For someone who wants to get up to
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:37:27 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Alexander Churanov wrote:
2010/4/9 Leinier
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Leinier Cruz Salfran
salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Alexander Churanov
alexanderchura...@gmail.com wrote:
Leinier,
I forgot to mention that character-mode IO also resolves all binary
compatibility issues and makes possible
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
On Fri 09 Apr 2010 at 07:36:17 PDT Alexander Churanov wrote:
2010/4/9 Leinier Cruz Salfran salfrancl.lis...@gmail.com
i want to ask you one thing: can you make the 'pkg_install' suite
reusable .. means install
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:18:09AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes:
Although I really like logo_saver with Beastie, we have the official
FreeBSD logo and I think it is time to say
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:17 AM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:01, Jille Timmermans wrote:
In Message-Id: 4bacb021.9000...@quis.cx
Op 25-3-2010 18:31, Garrett Cooper schreef:
-Wno-error .
-Garrett
I tried building world with it; but it doesn't seem to work :(
[q
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
2010/3/25 Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com
If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own
build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the
gcc developers are adding new warnings with
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 03/23/10 16:08, John Baldwin wrote:
[snip - looks like a good utility, will probably use it instead of
mergemaster if it gets committed, like the idea about automated updates]
To that end, I wrote a new tool that I
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:08 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have tried a few approaches (and looked at another) for updating /etc after
world upgrades over the past several years. All of these approaches have
various tradeoffs of pros and cons. However, none of them fully fit what
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Atom Smasher a...@smasher.org wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 05:12:47PM +1300, Atom Smasher wrote:
i'm trying to figure out what might be reasonable output from kenv. on
the three machines that i have access to i'm
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Andrew Thompson thom...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 02:09:41PM +1300, Atom Smasher wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Are you looking for data represented similar to sysctl(8)?
it doesn't quite have
On Mar 22, 2010, at 6:47 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010 6:40:17 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
Someone on the forums [1] noticed that machdep.hlt_logical_cpus
was unavailable on their system, and I did some poking around and
noticed that it was as well. Should
301 - 400 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
