NFS Client error

2010-03-08 Thread Giulio Ferro
Freebsd 8 stable amd64 It mounts different file systems by NFS (with locking) on a data server directly connected (gigabit) to the server Apache running in a several jails on those nfs folders. Now and then I get huge slow-down. When I look in the logs I get thousand of lines like these: Mar

Re: ZFS group ownership

2009-09-17 Thread Giulio Ferro
Nate Eldredge wrote: On SysV, you can get BSD-type behavior by setting the sgid bit on the directory in question, e.g. chmod g+s dir. Then new files will inherit their group from the directory. I suspect this will work on FreeBSD/ZFS too even though chmod g+s on a directory is undocumented.

Re: ZFS group ownership

2009-09-16 Thread Giulio Ferro
Adrian Penisoara wrote: Is the ownership of the new file decided by the open() syscall or by the filesystem layer ? On a superficial lookup through the sources it appears a filesystem layer choice... Which of the following would then be the best option (also taking POLA into account): * leave

ZFS group ownership

2009-09-15 Thread Giulio Ferro
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not I apologize in advance. I've always understood group ownership as a way to allow members of the same group to operate on files / folders which belong to that group, while leaving out others. Let's suppose to have a directory

ZFS group ownership

2009-09-15 Thread Giulio Ferro
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not I apologize in advance. I've always understood group ownership as a way to allow members of the same group to operate on files / folders which belong to that group, while leaving out others. Let's suppose to have a directory

ZFS group ownership

2009-09-15 Thread Giulio Ferro
I don't know if this is the correct list to discuss this matter, if not I apologize in advance. I've always understood group ownership as a way to allow members of the same group to operate on files / folders which belong to that group, while leaving out others. Let's suppose to have a directory

Problems with twa

2008-12-08 Thread Giulio Ferro
I've installed a 3ware 9500 sata controller with 4 1TB disks in raid 5. Apart from the usual wrong geometry warning the starting configuration is ok: I create a single partition with the default labels plus a /usr/home label with takes most of the disk space (about 2.7TB). When I reboot the

Re: multi-ip jail patch on freebsd 7

2008-07-24 Thread Giulio Ferro
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Since the multi-ip jail feature isn't yet part of the base system (why???) I was searching the internet for a suitable patch to apply manually. I couldn't find any. The one I found didn't apply cleanly to a 7 system. Can any of you point me to a working multi-ip jail

multi-ip jail patch on freebsd 7

2008-07-19 Thread Giulio Ferro
Since the multi-ip jail feature isn't yet part of the base system (why???) I was searching the internet for a suitable patch to apply manually. I couldn't find any. The one I found didn't apply cleanly to a 7 system. Can any of you point me to a working multi-ip jail patch? Thanks in advance.

Re: Synaptics Xorg driver for FreeBSD/amd64

2008-03-16 Thread Giulio Ferro
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Hi Eygene, I could only now test the new port and it works. Now it's just a matter of fine-tuning it (i.e. I'd like to increase the acceleration of the pointer) Thanks for the great job! ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org

Re: Synaptics Xorg driver for FreeBSD/amd64

2008-02-18 Thread Giulio Ferro
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Giulio, good day. Long time ago, in December 2007, we discuissed the problem with Synaptics touchpad driver for FreeBSD in the freebsd-hackers list. I had corrected the problem and driver seems to work, but I need more testing with real hardware. I had opened the

Re: Synaptics Xorg driver for FreeBSD/amd64

2008-02-18 Thread Giulio Ferro
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Please, try again if you have some spare time. Ok. Now the server starts, but the mouse pointer isn't moving... in the ServerLayout section I have this: #InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard InputDevice Synaptics_Touchpad

Re: Synaptics Xorg driver for FreeBSD/amd64

2008-02-18 Thread Giulio Ferro
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: in the ServerLayout section I have this: #InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer InputDevice Keyboard1 CoreKeyboard InputDevice Synaptics_TouchpadCorePointer And if you'll try 'InputDevice Synaptics_Touchpad CorePointer SendCoreEvents'? Nothing

Re: Synaptics Xorg driver for FreeBSD/amd64

2008-02-18 Thread Giulio Ferro
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Aargh, this is the funny thing: you have no devices that are handled by the 'mouse' driver. And Xorg automatically adds one. Please, uncomment your 'Mouse1' device inside ServerLayout, start moused and try again. The 'default pointer' should disappear. And probably

new linux-flashplugin9

2008-01-14 Thread Giulio Ferro
Doesn't work. Both with linux-firefox and native firefox it either hangs or crashes. I tried this site: http://www.patek.com os: 7.0 beta 4 amd64 Hope it helps... ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Synaptics

2007-12-26 Thread Giulio Ferro
Donnie wrote: On Dec 12, 10:51 am, Giulio Ferro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately those settings are already specified in /e tc/X11/xorg.conf in the section InputDevice for thetouchpad. If you look in the /usr/ports/x11-drivers/synaptics/pkg-message it's all already there I had

Re: Synaptics

2007-12-12 Thread Giulio Ferro
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: Giulio, good day. Good day. -- (II) Synaptics touchpad driver version 0.14.6 (1406) Synaptics_Touchpad no synaptics event device found (checked 10 nodes) Synaptics_Touchpad The /dev/input/event* device nodes seem to be missing (EE) xf86OpenSerial: No

Synaptics

2007-12-08 Thread Giulio Ferro
Hi, I just wanted to report that the synaptics touchpad driver (/usr/ports/x11-drivers/synaptics) doesn't work in my configuration: freebsd 7 beta4 - amd64 - synaptics-0.14.6_2 I set hw.psm.synaptics_support=1 in /boot/loader.conf, disable moused, change /etc/X11/xorg.conf according to the

Re: doubt about IPSEC - Freebsd 7

2007-11-26 Thread Giulio Ferro
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Baldur Gislason wrote: Hi, And since we're on this subject... is it possible to do IPSEC over UDP tunnels in FreeBSD now? I have a couple of networks with dumb NAT and need a way to tunnel out of them in a reliable manner. only with the patch, not

doubt about IPSEC - Freebsd 7

2007-11-24 Thread Giulio Ferro
I've noticed that in the kernel configuration IPSEC_ESP disappeared from the options. It says that you just need device crypto and IPSEC. Does this mean that with crypto and IPSEC I have all I need to treat ESP like the old IPSEC_ESP option? I'm having some problems right now setting up a vpn

Re: doubt about IPSEC - Freebsd 7

2007-11-24 Thread Giulio Ferro
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: I'm having some problems right now setting up a vpn to complete phase 2, (the error is no proposal chosen). Since ipsec-tools uses the facilities in the kernel, I want to make sure that the kernel provides everything racoon needs... That really sounds

Re: Nvidia amd64

2007-09-28 Thread Giulio Ferro
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: if there was a bounty system for FreeBSD I would pledge $100 USD for work that would help amd64 nvidia... heck I would even settle for someone that wants to take lead and setup a paypal collection. Sam Fourman Jr. I completely agree. Some guy here went as far as

Re: Nvidia amd64

2007-09-28 Thread Giulio Ferro
Remko Lodder wrote: Ok, let's see how we can fund this project. First of all the interested developers should assess the bulk of work to do and how long it will take them to complete it. Then we can think about how many people are interested in opening their wallet to see it come into

Nvidia amd64

2007-09-27 Thread Giulio Ferro
What is the status of the work required by the vidia guys so that they can code their driver for amd64 architecture? ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Nvidia amd64

2007-09-27 Thread Giulio Ferro
Alastair Hogge wrote: On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:15:52 Giulio Ferro wrote: What is the status of the work required by the vidia guys so that they can code their driver for amd64 architecture? Hey, There is no driver. I sort of surmised that already... Status can be found here: http

Re: Nvidia amd64

2007-09-27 Thread Giulio Ferro
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: There is no driver. I sort of surmised that already... So, we are still years away from seeing a working nvidia driver, by the look of it... I guess what I am confused about, is there someone actively working on the Nvidia requests, or does a capable

Re: Nvidia amd64

2007-09-27 Thread Giulio Ferro
Remko Lodder wrote: without that, do notice that people do this in their own free time, which could either take some time before it's there, or might not be interesting enough to work on currently (because of other things at work, private life other code etc). To say that there isn't enough

Re: Nvidia amd64

2007-09-27 Thread Giulio Ferro
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Giulio Ferro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To say that there isn't enough interest in the nvidia driver would be outrageous. No, it would be true. From the slew of messages on the subject (on the nvidia forum, for example) it wouldn't seem to be so true... I

WPI driver

2007-08-21 Thread Giulio Ferro
Hi, I'm trying your driver in my sony AR41S notebook: pciconf -lv ... device = '3945ABG Intel 3945ABG Wireless LAN controller' ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class=0x060700 card=0x9016104d chip=0x8039104c rev=0x00 hdr=0x02 uname -a ... 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #3 : Tue Aug 21 12:41:59 CEST