Re: The stack size for a process?

Jason Evans wrote: [snip] > > Thread stacks have a default size of 64kB. libc_r now uses growable stacks > with "guard pages" between stacks to try to catch stack overflow. It looks > like it did you some good. =) > > You will need to specify an alternate stack during thread creation to get

Re: The stack size for a process?

Matthew Dillon wrote: [snip] > At your csh prompt type 'limit'. If you are using bash type 'ulimit -a'. > > When I compile and run your program it works fine on my box. I tried > compiling it -O0, -O1, and -O2. > > % cc x.c -o x -O0 > % ./x > % Here's the ~>ulimit

Re: The stack size for a process?

Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > after making world of a CURRENT cvsupped yesterday, one of my > > applications stopped working because of a Segmentation fault. > > > > The C procedure where the problem pops has about 64k local variables. > > here's the assembly output of the procedure's b

The stack size for a process?

Hi, after making world of a CURRENT cvsupped yesterday, one of my applications stopped working because of a Segmentation fault. The C procedure where the problem pops has about 64k local variables. here's the assembly output of the procedure's beginning: 0x805bb60 : pushl %ebp 0x805bb61 : mo

Putting fsck_msdos in the source tree?

Hi, I saw 'fsck_msdos' in the NetBSD sources. Does somebody plan to put it (or similar one) in the FreeBSD distribution? Thanks --iani To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

The new samba performance

Hi, I posted that to 'questions', but got no reply. I wouldn't like to get 'hackers' bored, but I think this port is important for many of us (until win exists :). I tried to tune the 'smb.conf', but couldn't raise the write speed even a bit. I only like to know is there something in the kernel ca

The new samba performance

Hi, I posted that to 'questions', but got no reply. I wouldn't like to get 'hackers' bored, but I think this port is important for many of us (until win exists :). I tried to tune the 'smb.conf', but couldn't raise the write speed even a bit. I only like to know is there something in the kernel c

hot-swapping ata disks

Hi, I tried 'camcontrol rescan' and I found it works when I add a SCSI device while the system is on. I find it useful for adding/removing devices w/o restarting the box. (Maybe it's risky, but useful. I supposed that's the idea of the 'rescan' command in camcontrol) Is there a way to do the same

hot-swapping ata disks

Hi, I tried 'camcontrol rescan' and I found it works when I add a SCSI device while the system is on. I find it useful for adding/removing devices w/o restarting the box. (Maybe it's risky, but useful. I supposed that's the idea of the 'rescan' command in camcontrol) Is there a way to do the same

Re: A way to crash system (3.1 & 3.2) with floppy

David Scheidt wrote: [snip] > I can do this from -CURRENT from whenever CTM broke. I have a panic, and a > dump which i havne't had time to look at. The panic string is > panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs I know that's not the right mail list, but i feel (not sure) the fdc driver has probems some

Re: A way to crash system (3.1 & 3.2) with floppy

David Scheidt wrote: [snip] > I can do this from -CURRENT from whenever CTM broke. I have a panic, and a > dump which i havne't had time to look at. The panic string is > panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs I know that's not the right mail list, but i feel (not sure) the fdc driver has probems somet