Hello,
I am experiencing weird problem with Realtek network card under FreeBSD.
Recently (10 days ago) I cvsup-ed to RELENG_7, so that may be the cause
of problem too (although I noticed this only last 2-3 days).
Network card looses connectivity in some way after around 1 hour of
being
Jan Mikkelsen napisa:
A quick observation: This is not one process misbehaving, it is a
large number of processes misbehaving. From an administrative point
of view, I think the response is call setrlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC, ...),
otherwise the expected behaviour is for your machine to stop making
Julian Elischer napisa:
Cheng Renquan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Ivan Radovanovicriv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was testing FreeBSD's behavior when running many threads at the
same time
(and I find it performs excellent) when I wanted to test how system
will
behave towards program that
I was testing FreeBSD's behavior when running many threads at the same
time (and I find it performs excellent) when I wanted to test how system
will behave towards program that spawns itself too many times. I wrote a
very simple program
#include sys/types.h
#include unistd.h
int main() {
Dag-Erling Smørgrav napisa:
Actually, ls does pretty much the same thing (use a different layout
when run on a tty), and it's far from the only Unix utility to do so.
Usually, the tty layout is pretty while the non-tty layout is easier
to work with in scripts.
Actually ls doesn't work the
Ed Schouten napisa:
* Brian Somers br...@freebsd.org wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great
Doug Barton napisa:
Brian Somers wrote:
I recently closed bin/137647 and had second thoughts after Ivan (the
originator) challenged my reason for closing it.
The suggestion is that ps's -w switch is a strange artifact that can
be safely deprecated. ps goes to great lengths to implement
Doug Barton napisa:
If you're developing your own app to display running processes
implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
question at hand.
Doug
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
Doug Barton napisa:
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
This argument is so non-sequitur that I'm tempted not to respond, but
no, that's not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying
Alex Goncharov napisa:
,--- You/Ivan (Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:56 +0200) *
| Feel free to take a crack at this and send the results to the list for
| review. Improving the documentation is always a worthy goal.
|
| I would do that for sure if everyone thinks this ps behavior is
|
10 matches
Mail list logo
