Re: Using bit 21 of EFLAGS in user-mode [was: Re: sigreturn: eflagscreash (fixed!)]

2001-11-15 Thread Joe Clarke
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:56:31 -0500 (EST), Joe Clarke wrote: I learned about this by reading through some of the -hackers archives. One person complained of similar errors trying to get xine to work on FreeBSD. Removing the MMX detection code

Re: sigreturn: eflags creash (fixed!)

2001-11-15 Thread Joe Clarke
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Joe Clarke wrote: Sorry for the wide distribution, but I have sent email to both lists regarding this problem in the past. It seems that while doing intensive threaded operations in Gnome applications, crashes occur with the following

Possible pthread bug

2001-11-14 Thread Joe Clarke
I've been trying to track down some kernel errors I've been seeing on my -stable box for a while now with no luck. Admittedly, I don't know much about the internals of threads. I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction. I have a few applications that are generating SIGABRTs in

Re: Problem with snmpd

2001-09-17 Thread Joe Clarke
to 4.4-stable (because there was maybe a bug in snmpd :-p). I don't know what I could do. - Original Message - From: Chojin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Joe Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 12

Re: Problem with snmpd

2001-09-17 Thread Joe Clarke
/usr/local/share/snmp/snmpd.conf #snmpwalk -v 1 localhost public system Timeout: No Response from localhost As you see, without success... - Original Message - From: Joe Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chojin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Problem with snmpd

2001-09-17 Thread Joe Clarke
Opened by PID 168 Anything wrong? - Original Message - From: Joe Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chojin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:31 AM Subject: Re: Problem with snmpd What

Re: Problem with snmpd

2001-09-17 Thread Joe Clarke
- From: Joe Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Chojin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:40 AM Subject: Re: Problem with snmpd Those look fine. What about nslookup localhost (or if you're using

Re: Problem with snmpd

2001-09-12 Thread Joe Clarke
Can you send your snmp.conf file? These are the relevant bits of mine: com2sec local localhost public com2sec localrw localhost private com2sec mynetwork 172.18.0.0/24 public com2sec mynetworkrw 172.18.0.0/24 private # Second, map the security names into group names: #

Writing a packet alias translator, need help

2001-08-13 Thread Joe Clarke
is how can I put the correct port number in the TCP setup packet? How can I then use this port number in the upcoming UDP stream? I've never written a NAT translator before, so I'm not sure if FindUdpTcpOut() does what I think. any help would be appreciated. Joe Clarke To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: ProFTPd

2001-06-20 Thread Joe Clarke
I've heard that PAM in 3.x is mostly broken, but this is what I use for ProFTPd in 4.3-RELEASE, and it works fine: ftp authrequiredpam_unix.so try_first_pass ftp account requiredpam_unix.so try_first_pass ftp session requiredpam_permit.so Joe Clarke On Wed, 20