Re: fgdg

2003-03-16 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:39:22PM +0300, sergej wrote: mozno li ustanovit% odnovremenno na odin disk: unix i windows, i kak jto sdelat%! Get yourself a copy of the Complete FreeBSD by Greg Lehey, which covers this subject very well. This question also belongs to freebsd-questions, not

Re: Security through obscurity? (was: ssh + compiled-in SKEY support considered harmful?)

2002-04-23 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:34:52PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Well, yes. But I've been using X for 11 years. Why should I have to read the man page to find changes? How do I know which man page to read? If I did that for everything that happened, I wouldn't get any work done. And

Re: Security through obscurity? (was: ssh + compiled-in SKEY support considered harmful?)

2002-04-23 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: There are people who will tell people that still use X11 tcp sockets to start living in the 21st century. ssh X11 forwarding still works, it's only the (often much lower security) tcp sockets that are disabled by default.

Re: sysctls for hardware monitoring?

2001-11-22 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: It's just annoying to need a special program to get at the values. For some parts of the MIB, like the interface MIB, even sysctl doesn't help - you need to write a program to look at these. I still think, its easier to read the

Re: sysctls for hardware monitoring?

2001-11-22 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 05:51:10PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: Taking a Linux driver to argue against something doesn't really make sense. There is so many crap in the Linux kernel, that you can argue against anything: The crappy unix domain sockets don't work in Linux. Oh yeah, they are a bad

Re: arcnet support for FreeBSD (request for review)

2001-07-19 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 02:35:51AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: :Max Khon wrote: : : hi, there! : :what is arcnet? : It's a token-based LAN protocol. It's used in some embedded applications, as its controllers are cheap, it's pretty

Re: arcnet support for FreeBSD (request for review)

2001-07-19 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 11:27:43PM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Joerg Micheel wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 02:35:51AM -0500, David Scheidt wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: :Max Khon wrote: : : hi

Re: libpcap and pthreads

2001-07-18 Thread Joerg Micheel
Privjet Andrey, On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:27:39PM +0400, Andrey Simonenko wrote: Is it possible to use libpcap with pthreads? (I want to use just pcap_dispatch() function) I very much doubt so. It's not possible to use it in any kind of multithreaded applications, even with select()

Trouble with quotas on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE

2001-03-08 Thread Joerg Micheel
I am running a system with a 50GB /home drive. One user is experiencing inconsistencies, for him the system reports being over disk quota. du -sk reports 1.7GB utilization, quota reports 5.2GB. I've been checking the entire drive for files that belong to this user, same result. I have turned off

Re: Can I pthread with libpcap?

2001-03-04 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 08:13:36AM -0500, Dan Shechter wrote: Can I pthread with libpcap? I doubt it, but you might want to talk to Bill Fenner. Also see www.tcpdump.org. Joerg -- Joerg B. MicheelEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WAND and NLANR MOAT

Re: granularity of gettimeofday()

2000-11-03 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 07:21:21PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The long answer is: FreeBSD can deliver time with a resolution of 1/2^32 nanosecond = 232.8E-21 seconds. The actual resolution is much worse, because the hardware usually doesn't provide any better than about a nanosecond at

Re: Odd crash

2000-03-15 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 04:46:02PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: I just got an odd crash: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x8 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01d16ac stack pointer

Re: building a release

2000-02-27 Thread Joerg Micheel
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 11:47:33AM -0800, Brian Beattie wrote: I have looked at the FAQ and find only a partial answer. I would like to build a a release with base and X11, to do local installs of 4.0-current. I can build the base from /usr/src/release, I have the XFree86 sources. Can

Re: Need help with crash debug

2000-02-27 Thread Joerg Micheel
David, I haven't done too much debugging with FreeBSD either. A few small notes, however. I don't think the gdb version shipped is ready to handle SMP kernels. This is a deficiency, not sure someone is working on it, I believe not. Having said this, it is probably impossible to find the kernel