On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
I am looking at the upcoming release schedule, and I only see 9.1
listed - can anyone confirm or deny 8.4 ?
Although I am not on re@, AFAIK the only schedule that is on the table
is the one for 9.1.
Release 8.3 (April 2012) has it really been 6
Hi Matt,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Matt Olander wrote:
So, we've (iXsystems, PC-BSD) been kicking around the idea of a Long
Term Supported version of PC-BSD Server, which is really FreeBSD
with some PC-BSD cli tools and perhaps maintaining our own binary
update server. While we were thinking of
Friends,
I am looking at the upcoming release schedule, and I only see 9.1 listed -
can anyone confirm or deny 8.4 ?
Thanks.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Da Rock wrote:
I normally hate to dredge up old threads, but this is like getting halfway
through a story and not finding out the ending... :)
What is the answer? Is there a solution to this?
When I wrote the original post, I was expecting at most a benign
Hi Doug,
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
On 01/18/2012 11:46, John Kozubik wrote:
- mark 9 as the _only_ production release
While I understand your motivation, I am not sure this is a workable
goal when combined with the goal that others have expressed of longer
timelines
Hi Doug,
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
What I've proposed instead is a new major release every 2 1/2 years,
where the new release coincides with the EOL of the oldest production
release. That way we have a 5-year cycle of support for each major
branch, and no more than 2 production
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Dieter BSD wrote:
John writes:
- EOL 7
- mark 8 as legacy
- mark 9 as the _only_ production release
- release 10.0 in January 2017
Until a few days ago 8 was the latest, shinest release.
So you want to suddenly demote it all the way down to legacy?
I thought the goal
Hi Poul, Andriy,
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
FreeBSD has _always_ been a project by the community, for the community
and there is no way it can be any other way.
(You can consider this a law of nature as far as voluntary organizations
of intelligent beings governed by the
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Robert Watson wrote:
I think John gets a lot of what he wants if we just fix our release cycle.
Agreed. I still think that having two production releases running
simultaneously really hurts focus and the end product, but that's not
going to keep us from using
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
I was thinking about this and I'm with Andriy on this: such solution
has no long term potential and will only serve to stagnate the
innovation. This has been repeated over and over in this thread, but
it's worth another mention, currently, there are
Ivan,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Ivan Voras wrote:
2) Having two simultaneous production releases draws focus away from
both of them, and keeps any release from ever truly maturing.
This isn't how things work. The -CURRENT always has (and probably always had
and always will have) the focus of
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Tom Evans wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've concluded very early that because of what I've said above, the only way
to run FreeBSD effectively is to track -STABLE. The developers MFC-ing stuff
usually try hard not to break
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for the insights below ... see my comments inline:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Ivan Voras wrote:
Ability to use freebsd-update. It would be better to have more
frequent releases. As a prime example, ZFS became much more stable
about 3 months after 8.2 was released. If you were
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Mark Felder wrote:
Why is everyone so afraid of running -STABLE? Plenty of stuff gets MFC'd.
Yeah, I agree -- running -RELEASE is difficult. Hell, it's frustrating to us
that VMWare only supports -RELEASE and it took until ESX 5 to officially
support 8.2!
More
Hi Devin,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Devin Teske wrote:
I brought this up in last weekend's BAFUG meeting...
We're _very_ interested in replicating the long-lifecycle of the 4-series with a
newer series. But which one?
Right now, we're jumping to the 8-series, but after seeing that one of the
Hi Doug,
Thanks a lot for these comments and insight - response below...
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
I tried to make the point back in June that there was no reason to cut
9.0-RELEASE yet because we don't have solid support for clang in either
the base, or ports (amongst several
, but
it's a lot easier if the project isn't simultaneously working on a second
production release at the same time.
Thank you for reading this. I look forward to comments and discussion.
John Kozubik
[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2011-September/006630.html
[2] Thank you
Julian,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Julian Elischer wrote:
It pretty much boils down to one thing.. man power..
Wouldn't there be more manpower available for more frequent minor releases
if the project were not undertaking two simultaneous production
releases ? Specifically, wouldn't it have
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Steven Hartland wrote:
I was disappointed to see that 8.3-RELEASE is now slated to come out in
March of 2012. This will be ~13 months since 8.2-RELEASE and is typical of
a trend towards longer gaps between minor releases.
...
I must say as a small company that runs
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 08:39 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting John Kozubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Thu, 19 Jun 2008
14:38:11 -0700 (PDT)):
First, a bounty has been posted here:
http://blog.kozubik.com/john_kozubik/2007/12
all probably already running Linux Binary
Compat anyway...
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send
Sean,
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Sean C. Farley wrote:
I have spent a good deal of time last year attempting to port VMware
5.5.x to FreeBSD. Due to time, too many other projects and a beginning
level of driver development knowledge (someday I will fix this part :)),
I do not feel I can continue
is contained in a
tarball of /usr/ports/devel.
I have submitted this as PR misc/68757.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
it again
normally, the created file(s) still exist in it, and any changes made to
existing files in the snapshot are persistent as well.
I don't know what context this was being discussed in, but this behavior
does indeed exist, and I believe it to be a somewhat serious problem.
-
John Kozubik
:
http://www.kozubik.com/published/freebsd_bridging_ipfw.txt
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
conditions.
Comments ?
In the meantime I will retry this experiment with Cisco cards exclusively.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
am considering conducting this experiment again with only
`an` cards.
It would be very nice if there were a firmware tool for these cards for
FreeBSD, however I have heard that is a non-trivial project. Comments ?
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe
seeing (half of packets dropped
and high latency) exist are appreciated.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
for a
default of KVA_PAGES=256, however 4.5 and 4.6 have a KVA_PAGES=260 setting
in LINT, which I assume is also the default ... why the increase of 4
since 4.4-RELEASE ?
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
The pages are all going to be off-by-one from your calculations
the archives, please see my previous post in
this thread for specific details.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
/acd0c
# mknod /dev/acd0c c 117 0
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
penalty as a result of this ... except, again, in
the `vmstat` output.
I have no explanation for this. Comments ?
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
thanks for your patch - I think this _will_ be useful. Since there are
security implications in giving arbitrary jail root users access to their
own /dev/mem, /dev/kmem, and /dev/io devices, the ability to run `top`
without these items is very useful.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED
, if the devices are
bus-powered as opposed to wall-powered.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, James wrote:
From: John Kozubik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still do not yet own 63 firewire devices, and so, once again, I am
wondering if anyone here has
I still do not yet own 63 firewire devices, and so, once again, I am
wondering if anyone here has ever actually connected 128 devices to a
firewire host adaptor and had operational success... (or heard reports of
it being successfully done in the wild ?)
Comments welcome.
thanks.
-
John
be and
attempt to make connection. It will work.
You will also have an indication that it is working based on rapid
flashing of the activity light on the Lucent/Agere/Orinico/(insert OEM'd
version of that card here).
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe
0 for signal strength on both
machines. I will continue my testing...
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
)
If it is indeed a mistake on my part, help is appreciated.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
I found my cards at pricewatch.com - just type bluetooth into the top
search textbox - you should see 3com and xircom cards come up for $120 -
$150.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Nicolai Petri wrote:
Hi Warner,
I've seen cards
not duplicate anyones work.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
I had a feeling if anyone was looking into it that you were - if nobody
else is looking at it, I'll start working. I have a 3com and a xircom.
Please keep this in mind if you hear of anyone on (or starting on) a
similar track, and I will watch -mobile.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED
developed for just this
type of development)
Comments and information appreciated.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
as a whole describes a different process than what you are
doing, but this piece of the article is (I think) exactly what you need.
I would be happy to help further if you need it.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hello
designate where the link attempted to incorrectly
send the user.
-
John Kozubik - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.kozubik.com
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I'm going to dig up and old can of worms here, but I think I have
something new to offer that might fix
44 matches
Mail list logo
