Heck, it took 48 hours to get a response from a security
officer, and another 24 hours to get something from the guilty
developer.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:46:42 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rexecd root lockout
I'm working on converting Net
On Jul 14, 5:57pm, Ben Rosengart wrote:
} On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, John Nemeth wrote:
}
} > On one system I administrate, the largest process is typically
} > rpc.nisd (the NIS+ server daemon). Killing that process would be a
} > bad thing (TM). You're talking about killing ra
On Jul 15, 2:40am, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
} Garance A Drosihn wrote:
} > At 12:20 AM +0900 7/15/99, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
} > > In which case the program that consumed all memory will be killed.
} > > The program killed is +NOT+ the one demanding memory, it's the one
} > > with most of it.
}
On Jul 15, 12:53am, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
} Robert Elz wrote:
} >
} > From:Matthew Dillon
} >
} > | If you don't have the disk necessary for a standard overcommit
model to
} > | work, you definitely do not have the disk necessary for a
non-overcommit
} > | mod
On Jul 14, 5:57pm, Ben Rosengart wrote:
} On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, John Nemeth wrote:
}
} > On one system I administrate, the largest process is typically
} > rpc.nisd (the NIS+ server daemon). Killing that process would be a
} > bad thing (TM). You're talking about killing ra
On Jul 15, 2:40am, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
} Garance A Drosihn wrote:
} > At 12:20 AM +0900 7/15/99, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
} > > In which case the program that consumed all memory will be killed.
} > > The program killed is +NOT+ the one demanding memory, it's the one
} > > with most of it.
}
On Jul 15, 12:53am, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
} Robert Elz wrote:
} >
} > From:Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
} >
} > | If you don't have the disk necessary for a standard overcommit model to
} > | work, you definitely do not have the disk necessary for a non-overcomm
On Jul 15, 12:20am, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
} "Charles M. Hannum" wrote:
} >
} > That's also objectively false. Most such environments I've had
} > experience with are, in fact, multi-user systems. As you've pointed
} > out yourself, there is no combination of resource limits and whatnot
} > t
On Jul 15, 12:20am, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
} "Charles M. Hannum" wrote:
} >
} > That's also objectively false. Most such environments I've had
} > experience with are, in fact, multi-user systems. As you've pointed
} > out yourself, there is no combination of resource limits and whatnot
} >
9 matches
Mail list logo
