Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org writes:
On Fri May 27 11, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri May 27 11, Warner Losh wrote:
These look generally good. Just one thing I had a question on:
#
+# Enable FreeBSD kernel-specific printf format specifiers. Also instruct
gcc to
+# enable
Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de writes:
[...]
To be honest, I don't think that loader takes so much time.
When you set autoboot_delay=-1 and beastie_disable=YES,
the time spent in loader is negligible. (I'm assuming that
you also set BOOTWAIT=0 in make.conf, so boot2 doesn't wait
for a
Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I'm a Computer Science student at Northern Illinois University, and I
used FreeBSD for a long time. I'm interested in the idea that to
improve the nvi in the base system. My proposal is slightly different:
I want to fork nvi and make it iconv-awared
Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com writes:
Why not just use traditional vi?
http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/ (lives under editors/2bsd-vi)
This one lacks of many feature, compared with nvi.
nvi also lacks some features, e.g. lisp, modelines, sourceany.
ex-vi is more lightweight
# both built
Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com writes:
If you really want to use vi in a 32MB mem environment, the ex-vi may
make sense. It consumes 1600KB memory while nvi consumes 2000KB. Note
that the ee editor uses same amount memory as ex-vi.
ex-vi memory usage can be reduced a bit, e.g. by ~20% if you
5 matches
Mail list logo
