: On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:45:29 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
One obvious reason that the Linux approach is wrong is
that it ends up requiring the save and restore of FP
registers on context switches, which is overhead they
ate anyway, by doing TSS based context switching. The
amount of state with
: On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:10:48 +0100, John Toon wrote:
./setup: error in loading shared libraries:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid.
You somewhere have an LD_PRELOAD variable set for that library. This is a
busy cursor library and it is popular with Gnome.
A truss /
: On Thu, 07 Jun 2001 15:21:31 +0200, Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
I admit that all this is somewhat anecdotal, but I haven't looked in
detail yet at what happens after the signal handler has returned to
uthread/uthread_sig.c - _thread_sig_wrapper
Looking at code in question, I wonder whether
: On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:07:50 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
[copy context back into thread]
You can't do that. There is no requirement that the interrupted thread
is the one that handles the signal. If you copy the context back
4 matches
Mail list logo
