--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
I have some vague thoughts on using SW_WATCHDOG and a
hardware watchdog together.
I think this could be useful but I am not sure how to
implement this.
The idea is this: timeout for SW_WATCHDOG is smaller than
timeout for hw wd;
Hi All,
I'm not quite familiar with FreeBSD, but I want to do the following in 6.2/7.1.
/* Raise IOPL to 3 to open all I/O ports */
/* something like 'i386_iopl(3)' */
...
/* Open SMRAM access */
outl(unsigned int port, unsigned long int data);
Also, I appreciate comments on the
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 27/03/2009 12:35 Ivan Voras said
the following:
Takanori Watanabe wrote:
In message 17314.10813...@web45811.mail.sp1.yahoo.com,
Won De Erick wrote:
Hi All,
I'm not quite familiar with FreeBSD, but I
want to do
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 27/03/2009 15:47 Won De Erick said
the following:
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua
wrote:
on 27/03/2009 12:35 Ivan Voras said the
following:
One thing that comes to my mind is this:
http
Christoph Mallon wrote:
Won De Erick schrieb:
- Original Message
From: Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Christoph Mallon wrote:
Userland is not allowed to write to ports. That's the bus error you see.
Also without a call to the exit
Hello,
I was trying the assembly language program that is specified in the following
document (p24) to set, reset the built-in watchdog timer for the Boser Box.
http://www.boser.com.tw/manual/HS-7001v1.1.pdf
I then installed nasm in FreeBSD 6.2, and added the following lines at the
beginning.
- Original Message
From: Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Christoph Mallon wrote:
Userland is not allowed to write to ports. That's the bus error you see.
Also without a call to the exit syscall at the end, it will segfault.
Note
- Original Message
From: Christoph Mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Won De Erick schrieb:
- Original Message
From: Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Christoph Mallon wrote:
Userland is not allowed to write to ports. That's the bus
From: Won De Erick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Christoph Mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Won De Erick schrieb:
- Original Message
From: Rink Springer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Christoph Mallon wrote:
Userland is not allowed to write to ports. That's
- Original Message
From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph Mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're probably better of writing this in C.
maybe i get this as an option.
He's probably better off writing a watchdog(4) driver for the Boser (or
getting someone to write
- Original Message
From: Won De Erick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:18:46 PM
Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using
FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2
- Original Message
From: Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:21:04 AM
Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using
FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2
Won De Erick wrote:
I compiled the following em
- Original Message
From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Won De Erick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:16:31 PM
Subject: Re: NET.ISR and CPU utilization performance w/ HP DL 585 using
FreeBSD 7.1 Beta2
Hello,
I tested HP DL 585 (16 CPUs, w/ built-in Broadcom NICs) running FreeBSD 7.1
Beta2 under heavy network traffic (TCP).
SCENARIO A : Bombarded w/ TCP traffic:
When net.isr.direct=1,
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
52 root1 -68-
14 matches
Mail list logo
