Hi,
I running less with file more size 2Go
on fbsd v4.10R
and if execute 'G' on less cmd
G not seek on end file ...
Possible you have same pb/question ?
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
I use last freebsd v4.10,
and found this :
/sbin# /usr/bin/file ./adjkerntz
./adjkerntz: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1
(FreeBSD), for FreeBSD 4.9.1, statically linked, stripped
4.9.1 ?
same binary in /bin /sbin ...
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On this url :
ftp://current.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.9-STABLE-20040131-JPSNAP.log
Building 4.9-STABLE-20040131-JPSNAP is failed.
...
cpio: write error: No space left on device
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mask = bio
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
I repeat, same hardware (promise Fasttrack100) [same two ide cable)
with two ide disk Maxtor 40Go-ata133 is GOOD ! (fbsd49 installed
and kernel recompiled whitout pb)
Regard
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, rmkml wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Jan
Hi,
I have Timeout during boot
before panic !
I used fbsd v4.9release, (2x250Go WD ATA100)
but if use v5.2R : OK no pb !
If I use 40Go on same Hardware : OK with 49
Possible Help me ?
Where is download last 4.9 boot floppy ?
Possible to increase the duration of initialization at the time
Hi
fopen() on a pipe blocks multi threated applications.
If pipe is not ready for reading, fopen blocks every thread until STREAM
is ready.
Is there a good reason for this ?
I use fbsd v4.9 release.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
fopen() on a pipe blocks multi threated applications.
If pipe is not ready for reading, fopen blocks every thread until STREAM
is ready.
Is there a good reason for this ?
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I use fbsd v4.9 release.
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, rmkml wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:37:55 +0100 (CET)
From: rmkml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fopen() on a pipe blocks multi threated applications.
Hi
fopen() on a pipe blocks multi threated applications.
If pipe
Hi,
I've got a problem with signal handling and threads.
I've reproduced the problem in a simple code.
Description of program:
install a signal handler SIGINT.
create a thread that do nothing except waiting.
main thread use poll to wait forever [ poll(,,-1) ].
user has too crtl-C to
please can you give me an example
of mask to SET BLOCK ou UNBLOCK
in both threads (main and run)
in order to make this sample code working ?
thanks a lot.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:48:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rmkml
the vfork().
So, I try to understand what may cause the calling thread of vfork() to
freeze ...
Thanks a lot!
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:46:31 -0800
From: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rmkml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Hi,
is the _exit() function safe for a thread ?
my program use vfork() and then execve in a thread context.
The documentation mentions that the process has to call _exit() in case
of failure.
But this _exit() is really safe for the parent thread ?
Thanks in advance for the reply.
and I use freebsd v4.8.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, rmkml wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:20:04 +0100 (CET)
From: rmkml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question about _exit() function
Hi,
is the _exit() function safe for a thread ?
my program use vfork() and then execve
Hi,
Im found pb compiled :
# cd /sys
# make
.
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../common
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../btx/lib
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../.. -I. -DCOMPORT=0x3f8
-DCOMSPEED=9600 -I/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/libi386/../../../../lib/libstand/
sorry,
its my pb and not an Error.
Regards
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, rmkml wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:47:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: rmkml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pb compiled freebsd 49rc3 (iso)
Hi,
Im found pb compiled :
# cd /sys
# make
.
cc -O -pipe
Sorry,
I posted an error on my program.
Regard.
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:17:15PM +0100, rmkml wrote:
Im a process pb on freebsd47R,
...
gettimeofday(0x28126dec,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
gettimeofday(0x28126dec,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
accept
Hi,
Im a process pb on freebsd47R,
and I start truss over, I view :
...
gettimeofday(0x28126dec,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
gettimeofday(0x28126dec,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
accept(0x6,0xbfadcfa4,0xbfadcfa0)ERR#35 'Resource temporarily
unavailable'
in advance.
Bests regards.
Terry Lambert wrote:
rmkml wrote:
here is a sample code (vfork_execve.c) to demonstrate a locking problem.
The short answer is that your code is wrong.
The longer answer is that your code is assuming implementation
details in vfork() which are undefined in threaded
here is a sample code (vfork_execve.c) to demonstrate a locking problem.
The code launch 3 threads :
1 signal
2 endless do nothing
3 a socket server (bind to 127.0.0.1:12345)
The server accept 3 cmd:
1) close = close cnx
2) sleep = use vfork /execv to launch external /bin/sleep 20
to
ok sorry, change on Makefile :
CCFLAGS=$(CCFLAGS_BSD)
LIBS= $(LIB_THREAD_BSD) $(LIB_BSD)
Regards.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Hi,
Do you have the same pbs,
or can't you reproduce the same blocking ?
In my program, I use execve,
In your program, you use execv,
Do you think can make a difference ?
Why do you catch a SIGCHLD in sig_thread too waitpid, and you waitpid too in
exec_thread ?
Why do you use waitpid twice ?
Hi,
I've a problem with a C program:
This is a multithread client/server; there are 3 mains threads
functions:
- one to receive signals (pthread_setmask() SIGQUIT, HUP, ALRM,
sigwait()...)
- one to proceed tasks (pthread_cond_wait in an infinite loop)
- one to accept tcp cnx (listen, accept,
22 matches
Mail list logo
