On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 11:49:10PM +0800, OutBackDingo wrote:
I dont think I follow why people think its that hard to convert the
FreeBSD src tree to some other RCS with history, branches and tags
I seem to think this is doable. Seeing as Ive done it.
And how did you convert it exactly?
OutBackDingo wrote:
I dont think I follow why people think its that hard to convert the
FreeBSD src tree to some other RCS with history, branches and tags
I have a FULL CVS conversion to a mercurial tree converted from a
February 1, 2008 CVS snapshot. I also have a Full CVS converted to
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:00:25AM +0100, Johan Bucht wrote:
I've only tried CVS, Mericurial, Clearcase and a bit of Subversion.
And if you don't need IDE integration Mercurial seems to be working
pretty good.
I just read an article about the new merging and branching support
coming in
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:00:47AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Most tools seem to insist on trying to import the whole history of a
CVS repository before they let you start doing any work in the newly
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:34:58 +0200 Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 6:02 PM, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:45:55 +0200 Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to
use
According to Mike Meyer:
If the only thing preventing that was their OSS license terms, I'd be
surprised if they wouldn't at least consider relaxing them for
FreeBSD.
Perforce has already been thought as a replacement (back in 2000 when p4
was introduced) but it will not be able to deal with
Hi,
On Jan 31, 2008 6:02 PM, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:45:55 +0200 Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to
use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Mike Meyer:
If the only thing preventing that was their OSS license terms, I'd be
surprised if they wouldn't at least consider relaxing them for
FreeBSD.
Perforce has already been thought as a replacement
According to Aryeh M. Friedman:
Ports 2.0 is using aegis (aegis.sf.net)... any possibility for wider use?
Note: I am in the middle of making it FreeBSD friendly and beefing up
the automated portions of distributed repos
The day it can handle the loads that we have between src and ports, maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Aryeh M. Friedman:
Ports 2.0 is using aegis (aegis.sf.net)... any possibility for
wider use? Note: I am in the middle of making it FreeBSD friendly
and beefing up the automated portions of distributed repos
I dont think I follow why people think its that hard to convert the
FreeBSD src tree to some other RCS with history, branches and tags
I have a FULL CVS conversion to a mercurial tree converted from a
February 1, 2008 CVS snapshot. I also have a Full CVS converted to
Subversion. And they have
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 10:03:22 schrieb Julian Elischer:
I'm having to use mercurial.
I'm not really enjoying it.
works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it.
doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history.
We're using mercurial pretty much for all of our
I've only tried CVS, Mericurial, Clearcase and a bit of Subversion.
And if you don't need IDE integration Mercurial seems to be working
pretty good.
I just read an article about the new merging and branching support
coming in Subversion 1.5 and it looks like it might have some future.
The IDE
I'm having to use mercurial.
I'm not really enjoying it.
works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it.
doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history.
probably SVK is the way to go from what I hear.
Im using mercurial on full FreeBSD trees, curiosity makes me ask
Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project tracking
FreeBSD as base that would
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:45:55 +0200 Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 11:02 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:45:55 +0200 Adrian Penisoara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Subversion is a close second, but is still a little rough
around the edges. Most notably, merge tracking is in the 1.5 beta
builds, but not in the production
OutBackDingo wrote:
I'm having to use mercurial.
I'm not really enjoying it.
works ok for small projects. BSD is a bit big for it.
doe work foe offline editing, but loses all your BSD history.
probably SVK is the way to go from what I hear.
Im using mercurial on full FreeBSD trees, curiosity
At 8:45 AM +0200 1/31/08, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what
to use as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings,
what would you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off
project tracking FreeBSD as base
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:45:55AM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project tracking
On 2008-01-31 21:37, Stefan Sperling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could not find any tool that does this properly among subversion,
git, monotone and mercurial. That's not a big list, but I don't have
time to try out version control systems all day. Also, proprietary
VCS's were never considered
On 2008-02-01 02:00, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can keep 'importing' snapshots of the src tree from any arbitrary
CVS branch, if you are willing to wait until CVS checks out the first
copy of the snapshot.
This is how we 'resync' with the official doc/ tree changes in the
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project tracking
FreeBSD as base that would allow better teams cooperation and easy code
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hi,
Side-topic, if you bear with me: if you were to choose again what to use
as source revision control system (VCS) from today's offerings, what would
you choose to maintain FreeBSD's sources or a side-off project
25 matches
Mail list logo
