Em 09-05-2011 06:44, Tim Kientzle escreveu:
Have you asked the TRE maintainers if they would accept this change?
If they would, then getting this change into TRE would benefit a lot more
people than just FreeBSD's libc.
This is a longer term goal. First, I prefer having something to talk
Thanks to all for the valuable comments.
I've decided to continue the work with TRE because
- Many people don't like the idea of adding C++ code into libc
- I'm not very skilled in C++
However, in a later phase of development, I think re2 may be a good
source of ideas in optimizing the
On May 8, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
2, Optimizations for matching with a fixed pattern heuristic
... First, I was thinking of putting it into TRE but now I consider a better
solution building a small library, libregexutils or such. It would decouple
this optimization from the
On Sun, 08 May 2011 21:35:04 CDT Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
1. This lib accepts many popular grammars (PCRE, POSIX, vim, etc.),
but it does not allow you to change the mode.
http://code.google.com/p/re2/source/browse/re2/re2.h
The mode is decided when an RE2 object is instantiated
On Sun, May 08, 2011, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2011 21:35:04 CDT Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
1. This lib accepts many popular grammars (PCRE, POSIX, vim, etc.),
but it does not allow you to change the mode.
http://code.google.com/p/re2/source/browse/re2/re2.h
The mode
On Mon, 09 May 2011 17:51:46 EDT David Schultz d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2011, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Sun, 08 May 2011 21:35:04 CDT Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
1. This lib accepts many popular grammars (PCRE, POSIX, vim, etc.),
but it does not allow you to change
--- On Sun, 5/8/11, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
...
C++ may be an impediment for it to go into libc but one
can certainly put a C interface on a C++ library.
I wouldn't think it's very consistent to use C++ in libc.
Perhaps we could have the best of both worlds by using
libtre
Hi Folks,
I've been given the opportunity to work in GSoC 2011 to replace our base
regex library with a more modern one and given that the regex code is
something essential probably there are lots of interested parties so I
decided to open a thread here about my plans and the approach that I
Hello;
Thanks Gabor for this cool project!
--- On Sun, 5/8/11, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@kovesdan.org wrote:
...
- It doesn't provide the REG_STARTEND macro, which is our
non-POSIX extension. Still, it is useful and easy to
implement so it is not a problem either.
Our sed requires REG_STARTEND
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
http://sljit.sourceforge.net/regex_perf.html
re2 is in C++ has a PCRE API, while TRE is in C has a
POSIX API. Both have BSD copyright. Is it worth considering
Em 09-05-2011 02:17, Bakul Shah escreveu:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
http://sljit.sourceforge.net/regex_perf.html
re2 is in C++ has a PCRE API, while TRE is in C has a
POSIX API. Both have
On Mon, 09 May 2011 02:37:10 BST Gabor Kovesdan ga...@kovesdan.org wrote:
Em 09-05-2011 02:17, Bakul Shah escreveu:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Bakul Shah ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2011 02:37:10 BST Gabor Kovesdan ga...@kovesdan.org wrote:
Em 09-05-2011 02:17, Bakul Shah escreveu:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
Hello, Bakul.
You wrote 9 мая 2011 г., 5:17:09:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
http://sljit.sourceforge.net/regex_perf.html
re2 is much faster at price of memory. I don't remember details
On Mon, 09 May 2011 08:30:57 +0400 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Bakul.
You wrote 9 =EC=E0=FF 2011 =E3., 5:17:09:
As per the following URLs re2 is much faster than TRE (on the
benchmarks they ran):
http://lh3lh3.users.sourceforge.net/reb.shtml
15 matches
Mail list logo
