On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 10:53:54AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
It is generally slower to acces 32k
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 10:53:54AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 23:20:45 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
It is generally slower to acces 32k on different HDDs than to acces 64k on
one HDD.
It is
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:35:54PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior
Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:16:06PM +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS
Tensor Perth wrote:
No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large stripe size, the
chances are higher that you can perform the
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:16:06PM +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer
PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:59:46PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 8:12:17 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
For UFS/FFS there is nothing worth seting the stripesize to low.
It is generally slower to acces 32k on different HDDs than to acces 64k on
one HDD.
It is
The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
external case. These disks had been doing duty on a boat carrying out seismic
surveys, attached to misc. Sun workstations. These are typical
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:35:54PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS
Tensor Perth wrote:
No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large
The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
external case. These disks had been doing duty on a boat carrying out seismic
surveys, attached to misc. Sun workstations. These are typical of
On Tuesday, 3 August 1999 at 11:11:39 +0800, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer
PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
The people who I work for were about to junk a bunch of 6 year old disks when
I snaffled them. Among them were 4 DEC DSP5400S (3.8GB each), with a nice
external case. These disks had been
Did you try 'disklabel -w da0 auto'?
Yup - it also complained.
No, it would cause a higher I/O load. Vinum doesn't transfer entire
stripes, it transfers what you ask for. With a large stripe size, the
chances are higher that you can perform the transfer with only a
single I/O.
Even
13 matches
Mail list logo
