On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
[major snippage, much useful to think about here ...]
However, ls seems to call lstat in the same order that the files are in
the directory, and a normal clock approach to directories would yield
exactly the same result. Further, in the cases that
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Note that you can get another 8-12% by making negative cache entries,
since DOS/Windows clients tend to search the full path each time,
even though they have already received a successful response in
the past (i.e. there is no
At 6:29 AM +0930 7/6/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hmmm, I think that the major part of the problem there was that,
for what ever reason, Barry Feigenbaum of IBM, declined to add
a Change Working Directory or Set Working Diretory command to
the SMB protocol.
Thus, at least for the SMB protocol, and
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 6:29 AM +0930 7/6/02, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hmmm, I think that the major part of the problem there was that,
for what ever reason, Barry Feigenbaum of IBM, declined to add
a Change Working Directory or Set Working Diretory command to
the SMB
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
[major snippage, much useful to think about here ...]
However, ls seems to call lstat in the same order that the files are in
the directory, and a normal clock approach to directories would yield
exactly the same result.
5 matches
Mail list logo
