Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
> > I think that the attempt to change to the directory should be delayed > > until the event. This will cause the use of the forward path, which, > > if there is a timeout, will reinvoke the automounter, correctly. > > Yes the attempt to mount the dir should be delayed until it is needed. > But

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Jim Pirzyk
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > I was wondering if there is anyone working on AutoFS for FreeBSD. We > > currently have 4 studios with around 1000 unix systems of all kinds. > > Currently there are only 2 OSes that do not have autofs, FreeBSD and one > > that is known for its numbe

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Jim Pirzyk
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Konstantin Chuguev wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > No, I think he means the kernel VFS layer based AutoFS... ala SUN > > which was ported to AIX and I'm sure a bunch more platforms.. > > > > Besides of shell's uglish look of paths resolved from symbolic links created

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Jim Pirzyk
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No, I think he means the kernel VFS layer based AutoFS... ala SUN > which was ported to AIX and I'm sure a bunch more platforms.. SGI and Linux too. - JimP > > > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:52:22 -0400 you said: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:24:06PM

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Terry Lambert wrote: > In any case, you *could* use the Linux AutoFS module with FreeBSD; > there is a port which supports Linux FS modules loaded into user > space which one? /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hack

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
> I was wondering if there is anyone working on AutoFS for FreeBSD. We > currently have 4 studios with around 1000 unix systems of all kinds. > Currently there are only 2 OSes that do not have autofs, FreeBSD and one > that is known for its number crunching capabilties (and those are being > pha

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-25 Thread Konstantin Chuguev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No, I think he means the kernel VFS layer based AutoFS... ala SUN > which was ported to AIX and I'm sure a bunch more platforms.. > Besides of shell's uglish look of paths resolved from symbolic links created by AMD (like /.a/net/my_server/home/joy as my home director

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-24 Thread rbg
No, I think he means the kernel VFS layer based AutoFS... ala SUN which was ported to AIX and I'm sure a bunch more platforms.. > On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:52:22 -0400 you said: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:24:06PM -0700, Jim Pirzyk wrote: > > I was wondering if there is anyone working on AutoFS f

Re: AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-24 Thread Chris Faulhaber
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:24:06PM -0700, Jim Pirzyk wrote: > I was wondering if there is anyone working on AutoFS for FreeBSD. We > currently have 4 studios with around 1000 unix systems of all kinds. > Currently there are only 2 OSes that do not have autofs, FreeBSD and one > that is known for

AutoFS on FreeBSD

2000-10-24 Thread Jim Pirzyk
I was wondering if there is anyone working on AutoFS for FreeBSD. We currently have 4 studios with around 1000 unix systems of all kinds. Currently there are only 2 OSes that do not have autofs, FreeBSD and one that is known for its number crunching capabilties (and those are being phased out of