On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jacques Fourie
jacques.fou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.orgwrote:
Jacques,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
J Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev
Jacques,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
J Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing the
J right thing in the scenario where a mbuf chain is split with len0 falling
J on a mbuf boundary and the mbuf in question being a M_EXT mbuf?
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
Jacques,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
J Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing the
J right thing in the scenario where a mbuf chain is split with len0
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Jacques Fourie
jacques.fou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.orgwrote:
Jacques,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
J Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev
Hi,
Could someone please verify if m_split as in svn rev 245286 is doing the
right thing in the scenario where a mbuf chain is split with len0 falling
on a mbuf boundary and the mbuf in question being a M_EXT mbuf? Consider
the following example where m0 is a mbuf chain consisting of 2 M_EXT
System Administrator wrote:
Your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug in m_split() ?
Sent:Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:16 -0700
did not reach the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:21 -0700
The e-mail system
6 matches
Mail list logo
