On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for
freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs.
Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure?
gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains about
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for
freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs.
Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure?
gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Osokin Sergey
writes:
: try to cvsup your source tree to 4.0, then rebuild your system
: with simply make world procedure.
I can't do that. This system *MUST* be a 3.2-stable system. I was
building the kernel to test to see if a nasty NFS bug I've found in
-stable
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] David
Scheidt writes:
: Read the docs? Who me? It sounds like the 3.X to 4.0-RELEASE documentation
: should say not to do this. Unless, of course, gcc-2.95 is imported before
: t hen.
Give me a F*ing break. No such documetation exists and the more that
we
I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for
freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs.
Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure?
gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains about
bad assmbler contraints.
Warner
To
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for
freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs.
Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure?
gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains about
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for
freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs.
Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure?
gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains
In message
pine.neb.3.96.990804145111.73456a-100...@shell-3.enteract.com David
Scheidt writes:
: I upgraded a -STABLE system to -CURRENT using source a month or two
: ago. The first step is to build the new toolchain, so you shouldn't
: ever be compiling a new kernel with an old compiler.
In message pine.bsf.4.10.9908042352560.1550-100...@ozz.etrust.ru Osokin
Sergey writes:
: try to cvsup your source tree to 4.0, then rebuild your system
: with simply make world procedure.
I can't do that. This system *MUST* be a 3.2-stable system. I was
building the kernel to test to see if a
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
In message
pine.neb.3.96.990804145111.73456a-100...@shell-3.enteract.com David
Scheidt writes:
: I upgraded a -STABLE system to -CURRENT using source a month or two
: ago. The first step is to build the new toolchain, so you shouldn't
: ever be
In message
pine.neb.3.96.990804161056.80097a-100...@shell-3.enteract.com David
Scheidt writes:
: Read the docs? Who me? It sounds like the 3.X to 4.0-RELEASE documentation
: should say not to do this. Unless, of course, gcc-2.95 is imported before
: t hen.
Give me a F*ing break. No such
11 matches
Mail list logo