I notice that v1.10 is up in -current...does this patch still apply?
Dennis
At 06:58 PM 6/19/99 +0200, Robert Nordier wrote:
Dennis wrote:
F1: FreeBSD
F2: LINUX
F3: FreeBSD
F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
to only display F1 and F2?
At the
I notice that v1.10 is up in -current...does this patch still apply?
Dennis
v1.10 is just a variation on this patch, with support for dynamic
configuration using boot0cfg(8) rather than by way of a build option.
For instance
boot0cfg -m 0xd da0
will cause the second partition to be
I've bog
F1: FreeBSD
F2: LINUX
F3: FreeBSD
F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
to only display F1 and F2?
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Dennis wrote:
F1: FreeBSD
F2: LINUX
F3: FreeBSD
F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
to only display F1 and F2?
At the moment, no. Though you could use the following patch, which
allows the slices to be individually disabled. (The B0FLAGS setting in
In message 199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com Dennis writes:
: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
: to only display F1 and F2?
More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
not . Also, is there a list of partition types to ignore
Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com Dennis writes:
: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
: to only display F1 and F2?
More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
not . Also, is there a list of
On 19-Jun-99 Warner Losh wrote:
In message 199906191602.maa10...@etinc.com Dennis writes:
: F3 is a non-bootable file system...is there a way to get the boot manager
: to only display F1 and F2?
More generally, I'd like my Win98 partition to be identified as Win98,
not . Also, is there
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installation utility.
And with that you can name
On 19-Jun-99 Aaron Smith wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installation
At 11:52 AM 6/19/99 -0700, you wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:26:52 EDT, John Baldwin writes:
Then don't use BootEasy. The OS-BS boot manager is quite nice, and the beta
version (which seems very stable in my experience) even provides a nice
colorful menu on boot up as well as a nice installation
Will it allow you to
1) specify which partitions appear on the menu (ie, eliminate
non-bootables) and
2) set the partition last selected to the default/active partition?
Dennis
At 06:05 PM 6/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
On 19-Jun-99 Dennis wrote:
At 03:14 PM 6/19/99 -0400, you wrote:
On 19-Jun-99
On 19-Jun-99 Dennis wrote:
Will it allow you to
1) specify which partitions appear on the menu (ie, eliminate
non-bootables) and
Yes.
2) set the partition last selected to the default/active partition?
Yes.
Dennis
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough earlier.
---
John Baldwin
12 matches
Mail list logo
