On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:17, Ed Schoutene...@80386.nl wrote:
* Pawel Worach pawel.wor...@gmail.com wrote:
So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:45:44AM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Hi Roman
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 14.38 skrev Roman Divacky:
you could use llvm-ld (see the wiki for instructions how to do it).
there's also some
effort to make gnu ld usable with llvm LTO and I guess the patch
could be
So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
bigger code=lower performance except benchmarks :)
smaller code fits better in cache.
so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
and for sure there will be some. Good that FreeBSD will have non-GNU
compiler soon :)
* Pawel Worach pawel.wor...@gmail.com wrote:
So runtime performance is on par with gcc, code size is a bit bigger
so there is still room for optimization in LLVM.
I don't agree on the code size. Code size is comparable. I just did a
quick ls through /bin. There also seem to be a lot of cases
In message: 20090604093831.ge48...@hoeg.nl
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl writes:
: Good news everyone!
...
: So far we've only done testing on amd64 and i386. A lot of ports are
: probably still broken. Caveat emptor. Beware of dog. Slippery when wet.
objects in mirror may be larger than
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 20:05, M. Warner Loshi...@bsdimp.com wrote:
In message: 20090604093831.ge48...@hoeg.nl
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl writes:
: Good news everyone!
...
: So far we've only done testing on amd64 and i386. A lot of ports are
: probably still broken. Caveat emptor.
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 18.06 skrev Tim Kientzle:
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but it
doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html
).
In what way does it not
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:06:29AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but it
doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html).
In what
Hi Roman
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 14.38 skrev Roman Divacky:
you could use llvm-ld (see the wiki for instructions how to do it).
there's also some
effort to make gnu ld usable with llvm LTO and I guess the patch
could be backported
to our ld. I guess
As I understand the reply from Eli
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangbsd/
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:38:31AM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/projects/clangbsd/
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
installed
as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
You might want to
Thanks to the team for this!
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:38, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote:
Good news everyone!
As I mentioned at BSDCan, I was going to import my FreeBSD+Clang branch
into SVN. Tuesday I finally had some time to do it, so here's the
result:
Den 04/06/2009 kl. 11.38 skrev Ed Schouten:
You can now build your very own version of FreeBSD with Clang
installed
as /usr/bin/cc as follows:
Thanks for your hard work, Ed. This is great news!
You might want to mention that a few parts are still GCC-compiled due
to bugs in Clang ( see
Erik Cederstrand wrote:
LLVM provides a linker (http://llvm.org/cmds/llvm-ld.html) but it
doesn't interact correctly with conventional nm/ar/etc
(http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-June/005296.html).
In what way does it not interact correctly?
Kai Wang wrote a new
15 matches
Mail list logo
