On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Maybe I'll add how I understand what's going on:
GEOM calls destroy_dev() while holding the topology lock.
Destroy_dev() wants to destroy device, but can't because there are
threads that still have it open.
The threads
On Monday 01 February 2010 10:23:34 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Maybe I'll add how I understand what's going on:
GEOM calls destroy_dev() while holding the topology lock.
Destroy_dev() wants to destroy device, but can't
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Maybe I'll add how I understand what's going on:
GEOM calls destroy_dev() while holding the topology lock.
Destroy_dev() wants to destroy device, but can't because there are
threads that still
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Maybe I'll add how I understand what's going on:
GEOM calls destroy_dev() while holding the topology lock.
Destroy_dev()
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via devfs,
disappear at exactly same time. In my case, at time of unplugging SATA
Port
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:27:49PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via devfs,
disappear
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:44:51PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:27:49PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case.
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:27:49PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:27:49PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable
Hi all,
* Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
My exemplary case has been snp(4) before tty got rewritten, see r. 1.107
of sys/dev/snp/snp.c. No calls to destroy_dev_sched() that I placed in
the src/ a kept around, that is good because corresponding subsystems
got serious rewrite.
The
Hi.
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via devfs,
disappear at exactly same time. In my case, at time of unplugging SATA
Port Multiplier with several disks beyond it. All I have to do is to run
several `dd
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via devfs,
disappear at exactly same time. In my case, at time of unplugging SATA
Port
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:58:26AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Experimenting with SATA hot-plug I've found quite repeatable deadlock
case. Problem observed when several SATA devices, opened via devfs,
disappear at exactly same time. In my case, at time of
13 matches
Mail list logo