Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-13 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Harti Brandt wrote: On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote: RW RWOn Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote: RW RW I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description RW to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different RW processes. I've seen that top uses

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-13 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Andrew J Caines wrote: I'd also vouch for collecting orcallator data using rsync over ssh from the client systems to the cruching and report generating server. Wait until you would like to do a larger server park. Then you start running into performance issues because you nee to setup a full

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-13 Thread Harti Brandt
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: WJWHarti Brandt wrote: WJW On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote: WJW WJW RW WJW RWOn Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote: WJW RW WJW RW I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description WJW RW to get a picture as accurate as

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-13 Thread Borja Marcos
Wait until you would like to do a larger server park. Then you start running into performance issues because you nee to setup a full ssh/tcp connection. Whereas SNMP-v3 over UDP is a lot faster and simpler. And it is not like you are transporting majore security type data Well, I've been

Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Borja Marcos
Hello, I'm writing a performance monitoring data collector for Orca (www.orcaware.com) for FreeBSD 4- and 5-. I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different processes. I've seen that top uses

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote: I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different processes. I've seen that top uses p_runtime (FreeBSD 5 and FreeBSD 4), but I'm not sure if the value would be

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Harti Brandt
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Robert Watson wrote: RW RWOn Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Borja Marcos wrote: RW RWI'm not sure about the correct values in the process description RW to get a picture as accurate as possible of the cpu usage of different RW processes. I've seen that top uses p_runtime (FreeBSD 5 and

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Borja Marcos
This is very cool. :-) How are you currently extracting the information? One of the things I've wanted to do for a while is make sure all this sort of thing is exposed via snmpd so that the information can be gathered easily across a large number of hosts (say, 10,000). Right now I'm using a

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Andrew J Caines
Borja, I'm writing a performance monitoring data collector for Orca (www.orcaware.com) for FreeBSD 4- and 5-. That's great. As many Solaris admins know, Orca is a very nice tool for both admins who like to see resource usage and trends, and for manglement types who like to see pretty pictures.

Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD

2005-02-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:10:41PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote: Hello, I'm writing a performance monitoring data collector for Orca (www.orcaware.com) for FreeBSD 4- and 5-. I'm not sure about the correct values in the process description to get a picture as accurate