Matthew Dillon wrote:
The last two paragraphs are the most relevant to us.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-tech-encryption.html
Have we had an opportunity to have the Walnut Creek (or other) legal staff
review the actual rules for gotchas?
--
"Where
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Basically, does this mean something like
tar cf - /usr/src/crypto | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? :-)
No. Mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", Hilary is handling the database.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters
Have we had an opportunity to have the Walnut Creek (or other) legal staff
review the actual rules for gotchas?
No, this is something I hope to sit down with our corporate counsel
over very shortly. It's an annoying drive to San Jose from here, but
I'm prepared to make that sacrifice. :)
-
"Christopher R. Bowman" wrote:
The last paragraph would be a step in the right direction but still seems
silly. What are they going to do with it? I would really like to see people
educate them on the stupidity of sending code to Washington. I think it would
be neat if there was one of
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
The last two paragraphs are the most relevant to us.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-tech-encryption.html
Hmm. These paragraphs don't sound that nice:
[...] complex restrictions still affect
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 03:01:01AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
People posting ``open source'' programs would be required
to send the code, or a Web site address where the code was
displayed, to the government.
Basically, does this mean something like
tar cf - /usr/src/crypto |
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote:
But then, at the end:
People posting ``open source'' programs would be required
to send the code, or a Web site address where the code was
displayed, to the government.
Basically, does this mean something like
tar cf - /usr/src/crypto
At 03:01 AM 1/13/00 +0100, you wrote:
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
The last two paragraphs are the most relevant to us.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-tech-encryption.html
Hmm. These paragraphs don't sound that nice:
[...]
8 matches
Mail list logo
