Re: Extending find(1) to support -printf

2008-09-13 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Pretty late to the game, but ... On Mon, 08.09.2008 at 15:47:20 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Equally as frustrating, mutt's backtick support will only honour the first line of input. If a backticked command returns multiple lines, only the first is read; the rest are

Re: Extending find(1) to support -printf

2008-09-08 Thread Oliver Fromme
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:12:53AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Also, some folks on #bsdports asked why I was bothering with this in the first place: mutt supports backticks to run shell commands inside of a muttrc file. See Building a list of mailboxes on the

Extending find(1) to support -printf

2008-09-05 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
I've been working on $SUBJECT for the past few hours, and have managed to implement a very crude subset of GNU find's features: http://www.gnu.org/software/findutils/manual/html_node/find_html/Format-Directives.html#Format-Directives I've implemented %f and %p (which appear identical to GNU

Re: Extending find(1) to support -printf

2008-09-05 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 03:12:53AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Also, some folks on #bsdports asked why I was bothering with this in the first place: mutt supports backticks to run shell commands inside of a muttrc file. See Building a list of mailboxes on the fly below:

Re: Extending find(1) to support -printf

2008-09-05 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:39, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Equally as frustrating, mutt's backtick support will only honour the first line of input. If a backticked command returns multiple lines, only the first is read; the rest are ignored. This makes using BSD find annoying, since find