On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
Hi list,
this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature
compared
to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
c
On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
Hi list,
this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature
compared
to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
The fix was not quite right for -current (wher
> From: Sam Leffler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi list,
> >>>
> >>> this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature
> >
At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote:
On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote:
Hi list,
this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature compared
to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being
committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE.
The
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Tancsa
> Sent: Tuesday, 30. March 2004 19:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FAST_IPSEC bug fix
>
>
>
> Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that
> looks like is
> there but is not and is pretty important to keep
Julian Elischer:
>On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Helge Oldach wrote:
>> Mike Tancsa:
>> >Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that looks
>> >like is there but is not and is pretty important to keep lossy
>> >links functioning with IPSEC. My colleague [EMAIL PROTECTED] created
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Helge Oldach wrote:
> Mike Tancsa:
> >Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that looks
> >like is there but is not and is pretty important to keep lossy
> >links functioning with IPSEC. My colleague [EMAIL PROTECTED] created
> >the patch b
I have time to deal with this this week. Thanks.
Sam
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Mike Tancsa:
>Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that looks
>like is there but is not and is pretty important to keep lossy
>links functioning with IPSEC. My colleague [EMAIL PROTECTED] created
>the patch below that implements net.key.prefered_oldsa when using
Well, its not totally a bug, but missing functionality that looks like is
there but is not and is pretty important to keep lossy links functioning
with IPSEC. My colleague [EMAIL PROTECTED] created the patch below that
implements net.key.prefered_oldsa when using FAST_IPSEC. The discussion
ha
10 matches
Mail list logo
