On Thu, 2006-Jun-29 15:09:23 -0700, Randall Hyde wrote:
>>How about feeding the C source through the preprocessor, stripping out
>>the #line directives, compiling it and posting the exact gcc error and
>>source context.
>
>Okay, I'll try that when I get home. But I was kind of under the
>impression
-Original Message-
>From: Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jun 29, 2006 3:17 AM
>To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: FLEX, was Re: Return value of malloc(0)
>
>"Randall Hyde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>&g
-Original Message-
>
>How about feeding the C source through the preprocessor, stripping out
>the #line directives, compiling it and posting the exact gcc error and
>source context.
Okay, I'll try that when I get home. But I was kind of under the impression
that *GCC* runs the preproces
"Randall Hyde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BTW, if anyone is intrested in the full FLEX source, it's part of the HLA
> (High Level Assembler) source package found here:
>
>
> http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AsmTools/HLA/HLAv1.84/hlasrc.zip
>
Just wondering if those guys knew that IBM calls their mainfra
On Wed, 2006-Jun-28 22:40:45 -0700, Randall Hyde wrote:
>I seriously doubt seeing the code will do much good.
>Here's the offending line:
>
> YY_INPUT( (&yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf[number_to_move]),
> yy_n_chars, num_to_read );
How about feeding the C source through the preprocessor, strippi
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:40:45PM -0700, Randall Hyde wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Without seeing the code or the actual error message, I'm
> > guessing the answer is 42. Perhaps, some detail might
> > be appropriate.
>
> I seriously doubt seeing the code will do much good.
> Here's the offending line:
> >
>
> Without seeing the code or the actual error message, I'm
> guessing the answer is 42. Perhaps, some detail might
> be appropriate.
I seriously doubt seeing the code will do much good.
Here's the offending line:
YY_INPUT( (&yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf[number_to_move]),
yy_n_chars,
7 matches
Mail list logo
