Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage

2002-03-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Patrick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, procfs is pretty much useless these days (except for truss). In 4.5, won't `ps` (and perhaps other apps) not work for people in a jail if their jail does not have a proc file system mounted in their /proc ? Only 'ps -e'. Everything else will work

Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage

2002-03-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Patrick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. Does each jail need to have its own proc filesystem mounted? No, procfs is pretty much useless these days (except for truss). 2. Does kern.maxproc scale in a linear fashion with maxusers ? The default value for kern.maxproc is 20 + 16 * maxusers.

Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage

2002-03-05 Thread Patrick Thomas
Patrick Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1. Does each jail need to have its own proc filesystem mounted? No, procfs is pretty much useless these days (except for truss). In 4.5, won't `ps` (and perhaps other apps) not work for people in a jail if their jail does not have a proc file system

Re: Four misc. questions related to jail usage

2002-02-26 Thread Terry Lambert
Patrick Thomas wrote: 1. Does each jail need to have its own proc filesystem mounted? It depends on how you plan to use it. If you use no programs that need procfs, then you don't need it. The original jail documentation says to do that, but I have heard rumors that this is not necessary.